The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models
Open accessAbstract
Leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) network models are commonly used to study how the spiking dynamics of neural networks changes with stimuli, tasks or dynamic network states. However, neurophysiological studies in vivo often rather measure the mass activity of neuronal microcircuits with the local field potential (LFP). Given that LFPs are generated by spatially separated currents across the neuronal membrane, they cannot be computed directly from quantities defined in models of point-like LIF neurons. Here, we explore the best approximation for predicting the LFP based on standard output from point-neuron LIF networks. To search for this best "LFP proxy", we compared LFP predictions from candidate proxies based on LIF network output (e.g, firing rates, membrane potentials, synaptic currents) with "ground-truth" LFP obtained when the LIF network synaptic input currents were injected into an analogous three-dimensional (3D) network model of multi-compartmental neurons with realistic morphology, spatial distributions of somata and synapses. We found that a specific fixed linear combination of the LIF synaptic currents provided an accurate LFP proxy, accounting for most of the variance of the LFP time course observed in the 3D network for all recording locations. This proxy performed well over a broad set of conditions, including substantial variations of the neuronal morphologies. Our results provide a simple formula for estimating the time course of the LFP from LIF network simulations in cases where a single pyramidal population dominates the LFP generation, and thereby facilitate quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental LFP recordings in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simple model of spiking neurons
Izhikevich, E. M. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.820440 · Cited by 4,828
Hämäläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 · Cited by 4,684
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Posada, D., & Buckley, T. R. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490522304 · Cited by 3,927
Frequency Dependence of Signal Power and Spatial Reach of the Local Field Potential
Leski, S., Lindén, H., Tetzlaff, T., Pettersen, K. H., & Einevoll, G. T. (2013) · PubMed · doi:10.18154/rwth-conv-084442 · Cited by 3,639
Self-citationDynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons
Brunel, N. (2000) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1008925309027 · Cited by 1,726
Stoica, P., & Selen, Y. (2004) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2004.1311138 · Cited by 1,358
Adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire Model as an Effective Description of Neuronal Activity
Brette, R., & Gerstner, W. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00686.2005 · Cited by 1,277
Synaptic theory of working memory
Mongillo, G., Barak, O., & Tsodyks, M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150769 · Cited by 1,253
Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01092-9 · Cited by 1,242
Cited by
Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA
Watanabe, K., Taskesen, E., van Bochoven, A., & Posthuma, D. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5 · Cited by 4,083
Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials
Gao, R., Peterson, E. J., & Voytek, B. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.078 · Cited by 991
23andMe Research Team, Nagel, M., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., de Leeuw, C. A., Bryois, J., Savage, J. E., Hammerschlag, A. R., Skene, N. G., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7 · Cited by 799
Wang, H., Marcišauskas, S., Sánchez, B. J., Domenzain, I., Hermansson, D., Agren, R., Nielsen, J., & Kerkhoven, E. J. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006541 · Cited by 381
Motivation and cognitive control in depression
Grahek, I., Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Krebs, R. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.011 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazzoni, A., Lindén, H., Cuntz, H., Lansner, A., Panzeri, S., & Einevoll, G. T.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-12-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1004584
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2200681203
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584
- The paper
- Mazzoni, A., Lindén, H., Cuntz, H., Lansner, A., Panzeri, S., & Einevoll, G. T. (2015). Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.