The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes
Open accessAbstract
A central challenge in the analysis of genetic variation is to provide realistic genome simulation across millions of samples. Present day coalescent simulations do not scale well, or use approximations that fail to capture important long-range linkage properties. Analysing the results of simulations also presents a substantial challenge, as current methods to store genealogies consume a great deal of space, are slow to parse and do not take advantage of shared structure in correlated trees. We solve these problems by introducing sparse trees and coalescence records as the key units of genealogical analysis. Using these tools, exact simulation of the coalescent with recombination for chromosome-sized regions over hundreds of thousands of samples is possible, and substantially faster than present-day approximate methods. We can also analyse the results orders of magnitude more quickly than with existing methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
A global reference for human genetic variation
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, authors, C., Auton, A., Abecasis, G. R., Steering committee, Altshuler, D. M., Durbin, R. M., Abecasis, G. R., Bentley, D. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15393 · Cited by 18,247
Self-citationBiopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics
Cock, P. J. A., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., Chapman, B. A., Cox, C. J., Dalke, A., Friedberg, I., Hamelryck, T., Kauff, F., Wilczynski, B., et al. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · Cited by 6,080
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
Self-citationInference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10231 · Cited by 2,590
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906 · cited 2×
“Researchers are seeking to understand fine scale population structure using methods based on principal component analysis [112], admixture fractions [113–115], length of haplotype blocks [116–118] and allele frequencies [119].”
MethodHudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Genes mirror geography within Europe
Novembre, J., Johnson, T., Bryc, K., Kutalik, Z., Boyko, A. R., Auton, A., Indap, A., King, K. S., Bergmann, S., Nelson, M. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07331 · Cited by 1,479
Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical?
Stephens, Z. D., Lee, S. Y., Faghri, F., Campbell, R. H., Zhai, C., Efron, M. J., Iyer, R., Schatz, M. C., Sinha, S., & Robinson, G. E. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195 · Cited by 1,340
Cited by
Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program
Taliun, D., Harris, D. N., Kessler, M. D., Carlson, J., Szpiech, Z. A., Torres, R., Taliun, S. A. G., Corvelo, A., Gogarten, S. M., Kang, H. M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y · Cited by 2,213
Human Demographic History Impacts Genetic Risk Prediction across Diverse Populations
Martin, A. R., Gignoux, C. R., Walters, R. K., Wojcik, G. L., Neale, B. M., Gravel, S., Daly, M. J., Bustamante, C. D., & Kenny, E. E. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.03.004 · Cited by 1,391
Insights into human genetic variation and population history from 929 diverse genomes
Bergström, A., McCarthy, S. A., Hui, R., Almarri, M. A., Ayub, Q., Danecek, P., Chen, Y., Felkel, S., Hallast, P., Kamm, J., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay5012 · Cited by 1,020
Dsuite ‐ Fast D ‐statistics and related admixture evidence from VCF files
Malinsky, M., Matschiner, M., & Svardal, H. (2021) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13265 · Cited by 992
A method for genome-wide genealogy estimation for thousands of samples
Speidel, L., Forest, M., Shi, S., & Myers, S. R. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0484-x · Cited by 480
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelleher, J., Etheridge, A. M., & McVean, G.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-05-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1004842
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2951641704
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 27.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004842
- The paper
- Kelleher, J., Etheridge, A. M., & McVean, G. (2016). Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
