Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from large-scale pan-genome data

Open access
Moradigaravand, Danesh, Palm, Martin, Farewell, Anne, Mustonen, Ville, Warringer, Jonas, Parts, Leopold·2018·PLOS Computational Biology

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of microbial antibiotic resistance is a global health threat. In clinical settings, the key to controlling spread of resistant strains is accurate and rapid detection. As traditional culture-based methods are time consuming, genetic approaches have recently been developed for this task. The diagnosis is typically made by measuring a few known determinants previously identified from whole genome sequencing, and thus is restricted to existing information on biological mechanisms. To overcome this limitation, we employed machine learning models to predict resistance to 11 compounds across four classes of antibiotics from existing and novel whole genome sequences of 1936 E. coli strains. We considered a range of methods, and examined population structure, isolation year, gene content, and polymorphism information as predictors. Gradient boosted decision trees consistently outperformed alternative models with an average F1 score of 0.88 on held-out data (range 0.66-0.96). While the best models most frequently employed all inputs, an average F1 score of 0.73 could be obtained using population structure information alone. Single nucleotide variation data were less useful, and failed to improve prediction for ten out of 11 antibiotics. These results demonstrate that antibiotic resistance in E. coli can be accurately predicted from whole genome sequences without a priori knowledge of mechanisms, and that both genomic and epidemiological data are informative. This paves way to integrating machine learning approaches into diagnostic tools in the clinic. Summary One of the major health threats of 21st century is emergence of antibiotic resistance. To manage its economic impact, efforts are made to develop novel diagnostic tools that rapidly detect resistant strains in clinical settings. In our study, we employed a range machine learning tools to predict antibiotic resistance from whole genome sequencing data for E. coli. We used the presence or absence of genes, population structure and isolation year of isolates as predictors, and could attain average precision of 0.93 and recall of 0.83, without prior knowledge about the causal mechanisms. These results demonstrate the potential application of machine learning methods as a diagnostic tool in healthcare settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006258

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Moradigaravand, D., Palm, M., Farewell, A., Mustonen, V., Warringer, J., & Parts, L.
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2018-12-14
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
e1006258
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2903909400
Cited by
215
References
4
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from large-scale pan-genome data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006258
The paper
Moradigaravand, D., Palm, M., Farewell, A., Mustonen, V., Warringer, J., & Parts, L. (2018). Prediction of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from large-scale pan-genome data. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.