The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling
Open accessAbstract
Omic data analysis is steadily growing as a driver of basic and applied molecular biology research. Core to the interpretation of complex and heterogeneous biological phenotypes are computational approaches in the fields of statistics and machine learning. In parallel, constraint-based metabolic modeling has established itself as the main tool to investigate large-scale relationships between genotype, phenotype, and environment. The development and application of these methodological frameworks have occurred independently for the most part, whereas the potential of their integration for biological, biomedical, and biotechnological research is less known. Here, we describe how machine learning and constraint-based modeling can be combined, reviewing recent works at the intersection of both domains and discussing the mathematical and practical aspects involved. We overlap systematic classifications from both frameworks, making them accessible to nonexperts. Finally, we delineate potential future scenarios, propose new joint theoretical frameworks, and suggest concrete points of investigation for this joint subfield. A multiview approach merging experimental and knowledge-driven omic data through machine learning methods can incorporate key mechanistic information in an otherwise biologically-agnostic learning process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
What is flux balance analysis?
Orth, J. D., Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1614 · Cited by 3,903
Multi-omics approaches to disease
Hasin, Y., Seldin, M., & Lusis, A. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1215-1 · Cited by 2,953
Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine
Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Kalinin, A. A., Do, B. T., Way, G. P., Ferrero, E., Agapow, P.-M., Zietz, M., Hoffman, M. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 · Cited by 2,310
Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics
Libbrecht, M. W., & Noble, W. S. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3920 · Cited by 2,084
A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction
Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.203 · Cited by 1,789
Deep learning for computational biology
Angermueller, C., Pärnamaa, T., Parts, L., & Stegle, O. (2016) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156651 · Cited by 1,473
Deep learning in bioinformatics
Min, S., Lee, B., & Yoon, S. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw068 · Cited by 1,465
Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0
Heirendt, L., Arreckx, S., Pfau, T., Mendoza, S. N., Richelle, A., Heinken, A., Haraldsdóttir, H. S., Wachowiak, J., Keating, S. M., Vlasov, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0098-2 · Cited by 1,242
Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions
Ritchie, M. D., Holzinger, E. R., Li, R., Pendergrass, S. A., & Kim, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3868 · Cited by 1,085
Cited by
Machine learning for precision medicine
MacEachern, S. J., & Forkert, N. D. (2021) · Genome · doi:10.1139/gen-2020-0131 · Cited by 455
Machine Learning Applications for Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics
Liebal, U. W., Phan, A. N. T., Sudhakar, M., Raman, K., & Blank, L. M. (2020) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo10060243 · Cited by 357
A survey on deep learning in medicine: Why, how and when?
Piccialli, F., Somma, V. D., Giampaolo, F., Cuomo, S., & Fortino, G. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.09.006 · Cited by 348
Machine learning for metabolic engineering: A review
Lawson, C. E., Martí, J. M., Radivojevic, T., Jonnalagadda, S. V. R., Gentz, R., Hillson, N. J., Peisert, S., Kim, J., Simmons, B. A., Petzold, C. J., et al. (2021) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.10.005 · Cited by 313
Zhang, J., Petersen, S. D., Radivojevic, T., Ramirez, A., Pérez-Manríquez, A., Abeliuk, E., Sánchez, B. J., Costello, Z., Chen, Y., Fero, M. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17910-1 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Zampieri, G., Vijayakumar, S., Yaneske, E., & Angione, C.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-07-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1007084
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2948600471
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007084
- The paper
- Zampieri, G., Vijayakumar, S., Yaneske, E., & Angione, C. (2019). Machine and deep learning meet genome-scale metabolic modeling. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
