Cited by 9RNA Research and SplicingGene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

A model explaining mRNA level fluctuations based on activity demands and RNA age

Open access
Xu, Zhongneng, Asakawa, Shuichi·2021·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cellular RNA levels typically fluctuate and are influenced by different transcription rates and RNA degradation rates. However, the understanding of the fundamental relationships between RNA abundance, environmental stimuli, RNA activities, and RNA age distributions is incomplete. Furthermore, the rates of RNA degradation and transcription are difficult to measure in transcriptomic experiments in living organisms, especially in studies involving humans. A model based on activity demands and RNA age was developed to explore the mechanisms of RNA level fluctuations. Using single-cell time-series gene expression experimental data, we assessed the transcription rates, RNA degradation rates, RNA life spans, RNA demand, accumulated transcription levels, and accumulated RNA degradation levels. This model could also predict RNA levels under simulation backgrounds, such as stimuli that induce regular oscillations in RNA abundance, stable RNA levels over time that result from long-term shortage of total RNA activity or from uncontrollable transcription, and relationships between RNA/protein levels and metabolic rates. This information contributes to existing knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009188

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Xu, Z., & Asakawa, S.
Affiliations
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Xu, Zhongneng
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2021-07-23
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
e1009188
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W3185738930
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
transcription rate, metabolic rate, mathematical model
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, RNA, Fungal, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Computational Biology, RNA Stability, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review