Epitope profiling using computational structural modelling demonstrated on coronavirus-binding antibodies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Identifying the epitope of an antibody is a key step in understanding its function and its potential as a therapeutic. Sequence-based clonal clustering can identify antibodies with similar epitope complementarity, however, antibodies from markedly different lineages but with similar structures can engage the same epitope. We describe a novel computational method for epitope profiling based on structural modelling and clustering. Using the method, we demonstrate that sequence dissimilar but functionally similar antibodies can be found across the Coronavirus Antibody Database, with high accuracy (92% of antibodies in multiple-occupancy structural clusters bind to consistent domains). Our approach functionally links antibodies with distinct genetic lineages, species origins, and coronavirus specificities. This indicates greater convergence exists in the immune responses to coronaviruses than is suggested by sequence-based approaches. Our results show that applying structural analytics to large class-specific antibody databases will enable high confidence structure-function relationships to be drawn, yielding new opportunities to identify functional convergence hitherto missed by sequence-only analysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 88 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Robinson, S. A., Raybould, M. I. J., Schneider, C., Wong, W. K., Marks, C., & Deane, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deane, Charlotte M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2021-12-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1009675
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC8700021
- OpenAlex
- W4200425120
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2021-12-23)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L016044/1)
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche
- AstraZeneca
- GlaxoSmithKline plc
- UCB UK
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- antibody clustering, structure-function relationship, SARS-CoV-2
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Specificity, Antigen-Antibody Complex, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Antigens, Viral, Humans, Models, Molecular, Coronavirus, Epitope Mapping, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Computational Biology, Mice, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics, Single-Domain Antibodies, Databases, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review