Generative and interpretable machine learning for aptamer design and analysis of in vitro sequence selection
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Selection protocols such as SELEX, where molecules are selected over multiple rounds for their ability to bind to a target of interest, are popular methods for obtaining binders for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. We show that Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs), an unsupervised two-layer neural network architecture, can successfully be trained on sequence ensembles from single rounds of SELEX experiments for thrombin aptamers. RBMs assign scores to sequences that can be directly related to their fitnesses estimated through experimental enrichment ratios. Hence, RBMs trained from sequence data at a given round can be used to predict the effects of selection at later rounds. Moreover, the parameters of the trained RBMs are interpretable and identify functional features contributing most to sequence fitness. To exploit the generative capabilities of RBMs, we introduce two different training protocols: one taking into account sequence counts, capable of identifying the few best binders, and another based on unique sequences only, generating more diverse binders. We then use RBMs model to generate novel aptamers with putative disruptive mutations or good binding properties, and validate the generated sequences with gel shift assay experiments. Finally, we compare the RBM’s performance with different supervised learning approaches that include random forests and several deep neural network architectures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
An evolution-based model for designing chorismate mutase enzymes
Russ, W. P., Figliuzzi, M., Stocker, C., Barrat-Charlaix, P., Socolich, M., Kast, P., Hilvert, D., Monasson, R., Cocco, S., Weigt, M., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba3304 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Di Gioacchino, A., Procyk, J., Molari, M., Schreck, J. S., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Monasson, R., Cocco, S., & Šulc, P.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
- NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Šulc, Petr
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2022-09-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1010561
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC9553063
- OpenAlex
- W4297990198
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2022-10-11)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2155095 and TG-BIO210009)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (RBMPro CE30-0021-01 and ANR-19 Decrypted CE30-0021-01)
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement (101026293)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
- Keywords
- aptamer design, SELEX, restricted Boltzmann machine, thrombin-binding aptamer, interpretability, generative models, disruptive mutations, gel shift assay
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Thrombin, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review