Pathfinder: Protein folding pathway prediction based on conformational sampling
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The study of protein folding mechanism is a challenge in molecular biology, which is of great significance for revealing the movement rules of biological macromolecules, understanding the pathogenic mechanism of folding diseases, and designing protein engineering materials. Based on the hypothesis that the conformational sampling trajectory contain the information of folding pathway, we propose a protein folding pathway prediction algorithm named Pathfinder. Firstly, Pathfinder performs large-scale sampling of the conformational space and clusters the decoys obtained in the sampling. The heterogeneous conformations obtained by clustering are named seed states. Then, a resampling algorithm that is not constrained by the local energy basin is designed to obtain the transition probabilities of seed states. Finally, protein folding pathways are inferred from the maximum transition probabilities of seed states. The proposed Pathfinder is tested on our developed test set (34 proteins). For 11 widely studied proteins, we correctly predicted their folding pathways and specifically analyzed 5 of them. For 13 proteins, we predicted their folding pathways to be further verified by biological experiments. For 6 proteins, we analyzed the reasons for the low prediction accuracy. For the other 4 proteins without biological experiment results, potential folding pathways were predicted to provide new insights into protein folding mechanism. The results reveal that structural analogs may have different folding pathways to express different biological functions, homologous proteins may contain common folding pathways, and α-helices may be more prone to early protein folding than β-strands.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
The coming of age of de novo protein design
Huang, P.-S., Boyken, S. E., & Baker, D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19946 · Cited by 1,478 · see citing works
‘The entire protein universe’: AI predicts shape of nearly every known protein
Callaway, E. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-022-02083-2 · Cited by 113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The AlphaFold database [4] and recent predictions of more than 200 million protein structures provide reference structure information for nearly every known protein [5].”
BackgroundCurrent structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
Outeiral, C., Nissley, D. A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Huang, Z., Cui, X., Xia, Y., Zhao, K., & Zhang, G.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Guijun
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2023-09-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1011438
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC10513300
- OpenAlex
- W4386597884
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2023-09-21)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program of China (2022ZD0115103)
- National Nature Science Foundation of China (62173304)
- Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ20F030002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- conformational sampling, conformational space, transition probabilities, folding mechanism, protein folding diseases, protein engineering, structural analogues, homologous proteins, alpha-helix, beta-strand
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Molecular Biology, Molecular Conformation, Cluster Analysis, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review