The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing diverse and high-performance proteins with a large language model in the loop
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We present a protein engineering approach to directed evolution with machine learning that integrates a new semi-supervised neural network fitness prediction model, Seq2Fitness, and an innovative optimization algorithm, b iphasic a nnealing for d iverse and a daptive s equence s ampling (BADASS) to design sequences. Seq2Fitness leverages protein language models to predict fitness landscapes, combining evolutionary data with experimental labels, while BADASS efficiently explores these landscapes by dynamically adjusting temperature and mutation energies to prevent premature convergence and to generate diverse high-fitness sequences. Compared to alternative models, Seq2Fitness improves Spearman correlation with experimental fitness measurements, increasing from 0.34 to 0.55 on sequences containing mutations at positions entirely not seen during training. BADASS requires less memory and computation compared to gradient-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, while generating more high-fitness and diverse sequences across two protein families. For both families, 100% of the top 10,000 sequences identified by BADASS exceed the wildtype in predicted fitness, whereas competing methods range from 3% to 99%, often producing far fewer than 10,000 sequences. BADASS also finds higher-fitness sequences at every cutoff (top 1, 100, and 10,000). Additionally, we provide a theoretical framework explaining BADASS’s underlying mechanism and behavior. While we focus on amino acid sequences, BADASS may generalize to other sequence spaces, such as DNA and RNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 13,453
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791
Mutation effects predicted from sequence co-variation
Hopf, T. A., Ingraham, J. B., Poelwijk, F. J., Schärfe, C. P. I., Springer, M., Sander, C., & Marks, D. S. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3769 · Cited by 775
ProGen2: Exploring the boundaries of protein language models
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N., & Madani, A. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.10.002 · Cited by 480
Low-N protein engineering with data-efficient deep learning
Biswas, S., Khimulya, G., Alley, E. C., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y · Cited by 422
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- KK Yang, 2019, Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering, Nat Methods, 16, 687, 10.1038/s41592-019-0496-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Bachas S, Rakocevic G, Spencer D, Sastry AV, Haile R, Sutton JM. Antibody optimization enabled by artificial intelligence predictions of binding affinity and naturalness. 2022. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.16.504181v1 · DOI
- N Thomas, 2024, Engineering of highly active and diverse nuclease enzymes by combining machine learning and ultra-high-throughput screening, 10.1101/2024.03.21.585615 · DOI
- DH Bryant, 2021, Deep diversification of an AAV capsid protein by machine learning, Nat Biotechnol, 39, 691, 10.1038/s41587-020-00793-4 · DOI
- Z Wu, 2019, Machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution with combinatorial libraries, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 116, 8852, 10.1073/pnas.1901979116 · DOI
- BL Hie, 2022, Adaptive machine learning for protein engineering, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 72, 145, 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.11.002 · DOI
- J Meier, 2021, Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function. In:, 29287
- P Notin, 2022, Tranception: protein fitness prediction with autoregressive transformers and inference-time retrieval., 16990
- S Gelman, 2021, Neural networks to learn protein sequence-function relationships from deep mutational scanning data, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2104878118 · DOI
- C Hsu, 2022, Learning protein fitness models from evolutionary and assay-labeled data, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 1114, 10.1038/s41587-021-01146-5 · DOI
- A Shaw, 2023, Removing bias in sequence models of protein fitness, 10.1101/2023.09.28.560044 · DOI
- DH Brookes, 2022, On the sparsity of fitness functions and implications for learning, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 119, 10.1073/pnas.2109649118 · DOI
- Sandhu M, Chen J, Matthews D, Spence MA, Pulsford SB, Gall B. Computational and experimental exploration of protein fitness landscapes: navigating smooth and rugged terrains. arXiv preprint 2024. doi: arXiv:241112957 · DOI
- N Gruver, 2024, Protein design with guided discrete diffusion, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 36
- Frey NC, Berenberg D, Zadorozhny K, Kleinhenz J, Lafrance-Vanasse J, Hotzel I. Protein discovery with discrete walk-jump sampling. arXiv preprint 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.12360 · arXiv
- P Emami, 2023, Plug & play directed evolution of proteins with gradient-based discrete MCMC, Mach Learn: Sci Technol, 4, 025014
- Kirjner A, Yim J, Samusevich R, Bracha S, Jaakkola TS, Barzilay R, et al. Improving protein optimization with smoothed fitness landscapes. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations; 2023.Available from: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rxlF2Zv8x0
- CR Freschlin, 2024, Neural network extrapolation to distant regions of the protein fitness landscape, Nat Commun, 15, 6405, 10.1038/s41467-024-50712-3 · DOI
- K Ding, 2024, Machine learning-guided co-optimization of fitness and diversity facilitates combinatorial library design in enzyme engineering, Nat Commun, 15, 6392, 10.1038/s41467-024-50698-y · DOI
- Flier F v d, Estell D, Pricelius S, Dankmeyer L, Thans S v S, Mulder H. Enzyme structure correlates with variant effect predictability. 2024. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.25.559319v2 · DOI
- C Dallago, 2021, FLIP: benchmark tasks in fitness landscape inference for proteins
- NC Wu, 2016, Adaptation in protein fitness landscapes is facilitated by indirect paths, Elife, 5
- M Li, 2023, SESNet: sequence-structure feature-integrated deep learning method for data-efficient protein engineering, J Cheminform, 15, 12, 10.1186/s13321-023-00688-x · DOI
- Y Luo, 2021, ECNet is an evolutionary context-integrated deep learning framework for protein engineering, Nat Commun, 12, 5743, 10.1038/s41467-021-25976-8 · DOI
- Gelman S, Johnson B, Freschlin C, D’Costa S, Gitter A, Romero PA. Biophysics-based protein language models for protein engineering. 2024. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.15.585128v1 · DOI
- S Kirkpatrick, 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671, 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
- D Bertsimas, 1993, Simulated annealing, Statist Sci, 8, 10.1214/ss/1177011077 · DOI
- S Sledzieski, 2024, Democratizing protein language models with parameter-efficient fine-tuning, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 121, 10.1073/pnas.2405840121 · DOI · Paper page
- R Schmirler, 2024, Fine-tuning protein language models boosts predictions across diverse tasks, Nat Commun, 15, 7407, 10.1038/s41467-024-51844-2 · DOI · Paper page
- R Guerois, 2002, Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations, J Mol Biol, 320, 369, 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4 · DOI · Paper page
- P Notin, 2024, Proteingym: large-scale benchmarks for protein fitness prediction and design, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 36
- R Nikam, 2021, ProThermDB: thermodynamic database for proteins and mutants revisited after 15 years, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1035 · DOI
- S Kawashima, 2008, AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez-Uribe, C. A., Gado, J., & Islamov, M.
- Corresponding author
- Gomez-Uribe, Carlos A.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2025-06-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1013119
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC12169546
- OpenAlex
- W4411054928
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2025-06-16)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein engineering, directed evolution, protein language models, sequence diversity, protein design
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Algorithms, Mutation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review