Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fog2 Is Required for Normal Diaphragm and Lung Development in Mice and Humans

Open access
Ackerman, Kate G, Herron, Bruce J, Vargas, Sara O, Huang, Hailu, Tevosian, Sergei G, Kochilas, Lazaros, Rao, Cherie, Pober, Barbara R, Babiuk, Randal P, Epstein, Jonathan A, Greer, John J, Beier, David R·2005·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and other congenital diaphragmatic defects are associated with significant mortality and morbidity in neonates; however, the molecular basis of these developmental anomalies is unknown. In an analysis of E18.5 embryos derived from mice treated with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, we identified a mutation that causes pulmonary hypoplasia and abnormal diaphragmatic development. Fog2 (Zfpm2) maps within the recombinant interval carrying the N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mutation, and DNA sequencing of Fog2 identified a mutation in a splice donor site that generates an abnormal transcript encoding a truncated protein. Human autopsy cases with diaphragmatic defect and pulmonary hypoplasia were evaluated for mutations in FOG2. Sequence analysis revealed a de novo mutation resulting in a premature stop codon in a child who died on the first day of life secondary to severe bilateral pulmonary hypoplasia and an abnormally muscularized diaphragm. Using a phenotype-driven approach, we have established that Fog2 is required for normal diaphragm and lung development, a role that has not been previously appreciated. FOG2 is the first gene implicated in the pathogenesis of nonsyndromic human congenital diaphragmatic defects, and its necessity for pulmonary development validates the hypothesis that neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia may also have primary pulmonary developmental abnormalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Ackerman, K. G., Herron, B. J., Vargas, S. O., Huang, H., Tevosian, S. G., Kochilas, L., Rao, C., Pober, B. R., Babiuk, R. P., Epstein, J. A., Greer, J. J., & Beier, D. R.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2005-06-17
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
e10
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2147623970
Cited by
217
References
1
FWCI
15.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fog2 Is Required for Normal Diaphragm and Lung Development in Mice and Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010010
The paper
Ackerman, K. G., Herron, B. J., Vargas, S. O., Huang, H., Tevosian, S. G., Kochilas, L., Rao, C., Pober, B. R., Babiuk, R. P., Epstein, J. A., Greer, J. J., & Beier, D. R. (2005). Fog2 Is Required for Normal Diaphragm and Lung Development in Mice and Humans. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.