Common Inherited Variation in Mitochondrial Genes Is Not Enriched for Associations with Type 2 Diabetes or Related Glycemic Traits
Open accessAbstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction has been observed in skeletal muscle of people with diabetes and insulin-resistant individuals. Furthermore, inherited mutations in mitochondrial DNA can cause a rare form of diabetes. However, it is unclear whether mitochondrial dysfunction is a primary cause of the common form of diabetes. To date, common genetic variants robustly associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are not known to affect mitochondrial function. One possibility is that multiple mitochondrial genes contain modest genetic effects that collectively influence T2D risk. To test this hypothesis we developed a method named Meta-Analysis Gene-set Enrichment of variaNT Associations (MAGENTA; http://www.broadinstitute.org/mpg/magenta). MAGENTA, in analogy to Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, tests whether sets of functionally related genes are enriched for associations with a polygenic disease or trait. MAGENTA was specifically designed to exploit the statistical power of large genome-wide association (GWA) study meta-analyses whose individual genotypes are not available. This is achieved by combining variant association p-values into gene scores and then correcting for confounders, such as gene size, variant number, and linkage disequilibrium properties. Using simulations, we determined the range of parameters for which MAGENTA can detect associations likely missed by single-marker analysis. We verified MAGENTA's performance on empirical data by identifying known relevant pathways in lipid and lipoprotein GWA meta-analyses. We then tested our mitochondrial hypothesis by applying MAGENTA to three gene sets: nuclear regulators of mitochondrial genes, oxidative phosphorylation genes, and approximately 1,000 nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. The analysis was performed using the most recent T2D GWA meta-analysis of 47,117 people and meta-analyses of seven diabetes-related glycemic traits (up to 46,186 non-diabetic individuals). This well-powered analysis found no significant enrichment of associations to T2D or any of the glycemic traits in any of the gene sets tested. These results suggest that common variants affecting nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes have at most a small genetic contribution to T2D susceptibility.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
INRICH, ALIGATOR, and MAGENTA are best-SNP-per-gene methods that count pathway genes with independent SNPs above a significance threshold, correcting for LD and genomic structure via Monte-Carlo simulation.
“INRICH45, ALIGATOR9 and MAGENTA46 are “best SNP per gene” methods that count the number of genes in a pathway where a number of independent SNPs exceed a predefined significance, and adjust for LD and genomic structure with corrected statistics derived by Monte-Carlo simulation.”
From Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways (2015) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 463
- Authors
- Segrè, A. V., DIAGRAM Consortium, MAGIC investigators, Groop, L., Mootha, V. K., Daly, M. J., & Altshuler, D.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Segrè, Ayellet V.
- Altshuler, David
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-08-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1001058
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC2920848
- OpenAlex
- W2167806431
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- American Diabetes Association
- Richard and Susan Smith Family Foundation
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, mitochondrial genes, mitochondrial dysfunction, magenta, gene set enrichment analysis, polygenic risk, glycemic traits, nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial DNA mutations, genetic susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucose, Genetic Variation, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Mitochondrial Proteins, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review