The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Accuracy of Genomic Prediction: Coat Colour, Milk-Fat Percentage, and Type in Holstein Cattle as Contrasting Model Traits
Open accessAbstract
Prediction of genetic merit using dense SNP genotypes can be used for estimation of breeding values for selection of livestock, crops, and forage species; for prediction of disease risk; and for forensics. The accuracy of these genomic predictions depends in part on the genetic architecture of the trait, in particular number of loci affecting the trait and distribution of their effects. Here we investigate the difference among three traits in distribution of effects and the consequences for the accuracy of genomic predictions. Proportion of black coat colour in Holstein cattle was used as one model complex trait. Three loci, KIT, MITF, and a locus on chromosome 8, together explain 24% of the variation of proportion of black. However, a surprisingly large number of loci of small effect are necessary to capture the remaining variation. A second trait, fat concentration in milk, had one locus of large effect and a host of loci with very small effects. Both these distributions of effects were in contrast to that for a third trait, an index of scores for a number of aspects of cow confirmation ("overall type"), which had only loci of small effect. The differences in distribution of effects among the three traits were quantified by estimating the distribution of variance explained by chromosome segments containing 50 SNPs. This approach was taken to account for the imperfect linkage disequilibrium between the SNPs and the QTL affecting the traits. We also show that the accuracy of predicting genetic values is higher for traits with a proportion of large effects (proportion black and fat percentage) than for a trait with no loci of large effect (overall type), provided the method of analysis takes advantage of the distribution of loci effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Self-citationScheet, P., & Stephens, M. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/502802 · Cited by 1,941
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges
Hayes, B. J., Bowman, P. J., Chamberlain, A. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1646 · Cited by 1,795
Self-citationPersonal genomes: The case of the missing heritability
Maher, B. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/456018a · Cited by 1,737
Invited Review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls
VanRaden, P. M., Van Tassell, C. P., Wiggans, G. R., Sonstegard, T. S., Schnabel, R. D., Taylor, J. F., & Schenkel, F. S. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1514 · Cited by 1,331
The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2007) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · Cited by 1,320
Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes
Goddard, M. E., & Hayes, B. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2575 · Cited by 1,097
Self-citationGenomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response
Goddard, M. (2009) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 · Cited by 1,089
Self-citationGrisart, B., Coppieters, W., Farnir, F., Karim, L., Ford, C., Berzi, P., Cambisano, N., Mni, M., Reid, S., Simon, P., et al. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.224202 · Cited by 965
Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds
The Bovine HapMap Consortium, Gibbs, R. A., Taylor, J. F., Van Tassell, C. P., Barendse, W., Eversole, K. A., Gill, C. A., Green, R. D., Hamernik, D. L., Kappes, S. M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167936 · Cited by 868
Self-citation
Cited by
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors
Ge, T., Chen, C.-Y., Ni, Y., Feng, Y.-C. A., & Smoller, J. W. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5 · Cited by 1,922
Polygenic Modeling with Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Models
Zhou, X., Carbonetto, P., & Stephens, M. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003264 · Cited by 800
Genome-Wide Scan for Adaptive Divergence and Association with Population-Specific Covariates
Gautier, M. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.181453 · Cited by 512
Multiple-Trait Genomic Selection Methods Increase Genetic Value Prediction Accuracy
Jia, Y., & Jannink, J.-L. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.144246 · Cited by 498
Daetwyler, H. D., Calus, M. P. L., Pong-Wong, R., de los Campos, G., & Hickey, J. M. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.147983 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, B. J., Pryce, J., Chamberlain, A. J., Bowman, P. J., & Goddard, M. E.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-09-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1001139
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2077946779
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Accuracy of Genomic Prediction: Coat Colour, Milk-Fat Percentage, and Type in Holstein Cattle as Contrasting Model Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139
- The paper
- Hayes, B. J., Pryce, J., Chamberlain, A. J., Bowman, P. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2010). Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Accuracy of Genomic Prediction: Coat Colour, Milk-Fat Percentage, and Type in Holstein Cattle as Contrasting Model Traits. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.