Cited by 132DNA Repair MechanismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

PCNA Ubiquitination Is Important, But Not Essential for Translesion DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells

Open access
Hendel, Ayal, Krijger, Peter H. L., Diamant, Noam, Goren, Zohar, Langerak, Petra, Kim, Jungmin, Reißner, Thomas, Lee, Kyoo-young +7 more·2011·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a DNA damage tolerance mechanism in which specialized low-fidelity DNA polymerases bypass replication-blocking lesions, and it is usually associated with mutagenesis. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae a key event in TLS is the monoubiquitination of PCNA, which enables recruitment of the specialized polymerases to the damaged site through their ubiquitin-binding domain. In mammals, however, there is a debate on the requirement for ubiquitinated PCNA (PCNA-Ub) in TLS. We show that UV-induced Rpa foci, indicative of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions caused by UV, accumulate faster and disappear more slowly in Pcna(K164R/K164R) cells, which are resistant to PCNA ubiquitination, compared to Pcna(+/+) cells, consistent with a TLS defect. Direct analysis of TLS in these cells, using gapped plasmids with site-specific lesions, showed that TLS is strongly reduced across UV lesions and the cisplatin-induced intrastrand GG crosslink. A similar effect was obtained in cells lacking Rad18, the E3 ubiquitin ligase which monoubiquitinates PCNA. Consistently, cells lacking Usp1, the enzyme that de-ubiquitinates PCNA exhibited increased TLS across a UV lesion and the cisplatin adduct. In contrast, cells lacking the Rad5-homologs Shprh and Hltf, which polyubiquitinate PCNA, exhibited normal TLS. Knocking down the expression of the TLS genes Rev3L, PolH, or Rev1 in Pcna(K164R/K164R) mouse embryo fibroblasts caused each an increased sensitivity to UV radiation, indicating the existence of TLS pathways that are independent of PCNA-Ub. Taken together these results indicate that PCNA-Ub is required for maximal TLS. However, TLS polymerases can be recruited to damaged DNA also in the absence of PCNA-Ub, and perform TLS, albeit at a significantly lower efficiency and altered mutagenic specificity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002262

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 132

Authors
Hendel, A., Krijger, P. H. L., Diamant, N., Goren, Z., Langerak, P., Kim, J., Reißner, T., Lee, K.-Y., Geacintov, N. E., Carell, T., Myung, K., Tateishi, S., D'Andrea, A., Jacobs, H., & Livneh, Z.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Institute of Molecular Embryology and Genetics, Kumamoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Jacobs, Heinz
  • Livneh, Zvi
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-09-08
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e1002262
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2138261613
Cited by
132
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • Israel Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-099194, R01CA099194)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
translesion synthesis, PCNA ubiquitination, DNA damage tolerance, UV-induced DNA damage, cisplatin-DNA adducts, RAD18, USP1, HLTF, REV3L, DNA polymerase eta, Rev1, mutagenesis, single-stranded DNA, mouse embryonic fibroblasts
MeSH terms
Animals, Cisplatin, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, DNA, Single-Stranded, Ultraviolet Rays, Mutagenesis, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Ubiquitin, Mice, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review