Preventing Dangerous Nonsense: Selection for Robustness to Transcriptional Error in Human Genes
Open accessAbstract
Nonsense Mediated Decay (NMD) degrades transcripts that contain a premature STOP codon resulting from mistranscription or missplicing. However NMD's surveillance of gene expression varies in efficiency both among and within human genes. Previous work has shown that the intron content of human genes is influenced by missplicing events invisible to NMD. Given the high rate of transcriptional errors in eukaryotes, we hypothesized that natural selection has promoted a dual strategy of "prevention and cure" to alleviate the problem of nonsense transcriptional errors. A prediction of this hypothesis is that NMD's inefficiency should leave a signature of "transcriptional robustness" in human gene sequences that reduces the frequency of nonsense transcriptional errors. For human genes we determined the usage of "fragile" codons, prone to mistranscription into STOP codons, relative to the usage of "robust" codons that do not generate nonsense errors. We observe that single-exon genes have evolved to become robust to mistranscription, because they show a significant tendency to avoid fragile codons relative to robust codons when compared to multi-exon genes. A similar depletion is evident in last exons of multi-exon genes. Histone genes are particularly depleted of fragile codons and thus highly robust to transcriptional errors. Finally, the protein products of single-exon genes show a strong tendency to avoid those amino acids that can only be encoded using fragile codons. Each of these observations can be attributed to NMD deficiency. Thus, in the human genome, wherever the "cure" for nonsense (i.e. NMD) is inefficient, there is increased reliance on the strategy of nonsense "prevention" (i.e. transcriptional robustness). This study shows that human genes are exposed to the deleterious influence of transcriptional errors. Moreover, it suggests that gene expression errors are an underestimated phenomenon, in molecular evolution in general and in selection for genomic robustness in particular.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cfap20ua5025 frameshift mutation leads to an approximately 90% reduction in cfap20 transcript abundance.
“The frameshift mutation leads to an ~90% reduction in cfap20 transcript abundance (Fig. 2c), presumably due to nonsense-mediated decay24–26.”
From The inner junction protein CFAP20 functions in motile and non-motile cilia and is critical for vision (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
The Introduction (page unavailable) explains that nonsense-mediated decay detects transcripts with premature termination codons, supporting the proposed mechanism. The paper does not report a cfap20 frameshift mutation or an approximately 90% reduction in its transcript abundance; that measurement is attributed to Fig. 2c in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]Wen J Brogna S 2010 Splicing-dependent NMD does not require the EJC in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Embo J 29 1537 1551 20360683 PMC2876954
- Authors
- Cusack, B. P., Arndt, P. F., Duret, L., & Crollius, H. R.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (DE)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Cusack, Brian P.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-10-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e1002276
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC3192821
- OpenAlex
- W2150791948
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, premature stop codon, aberrant splicing, natural selection, histone genes, single-exon genes, amino acid utilization, human genes
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Animals, Codon, Drosophila, Exons, Genes, Histones, Humans, Introns, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, Genome, Human, Genome, Codon, Nonsense, Evolution, Molecular, RNA Stability, Mice, Nonsense Mediated mRNA Decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review