Adaptive Evolution of the Lactose Utilization Network in Experimentally Evolved Populations of Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Adaptation to novel environments is often associated with changes in gene regulation. Nevertheless, few studies have been able both to identify the genetic basis of changes in regulation and to demonstrate why these changes are beneficial. To this end, we have focused on understanding both how and why the lactose utilization network has evolved in replicate populations of Escherichia coli. We found that lac operon regulation became strikingly variable, including changes in the mode of environmental response (bimodal, graded, and constitutive), sensitivity to inducer concentration, and maximum expression level. In addition, some classes of regulatory change were enriched in specific selective environments. Sequencing of evolved clones, combined with reconstruction of individual mutations in the ancestral background, identified mutations within the lac operon that recapitulate many of the evolved regulatory changes. These mutations conferred fitness benefits in environments containing lactose, indicating that the regulatory changes are adaptive. The same mutations conferred different fitness effects when present in an evolved clone, indicating that interactions between the lac operon and other evolved mutations also contribute to fitness. Similarly, changes in lac regulation not explained by lac operon mutations also point to important interactions with other evolved mutations. Together these results underline how dynamic regulatory interactions can be, in this case evolving through mutations both within and external to the canonical lactose utilization network.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For lactose in E. coli, lacZ expression levels were evolutionary fine-tuned depending on the lactose concentration in the environment, in order to balance the cost of lacZ expression and increased fitness.
“For other, tightly regulated carbon sources such as lactose in E. coli, it was shown that lacZ expression levels were evolutionary fine-tuned depending on the lactose concentration in the environment, in order to balance the cost of lacZ expression and increased fitness [68].”
From Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology (2013) · cites this paper as [68]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Quan, S., Ray, J. C. J., Kwota, Z., Duong, T., Balázsi, G., Cooper, T. F., & Monds, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- University of Houston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Monds, Russell D.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-01-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1002444
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC3257284
- OpenAlex
- W2110540877
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1021675, 1022373)
- National Institutes of Health (DP2OD006481)
- Stanford Bio-X
- Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (1021675)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- lac operon, lactose utilization, gene regulatory evolution, adaptive evolution, Escherichia coli, experimental evolution, population genetics, regulatory mutations, fitness effects, pleiotropy
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Environment, Escherichia coli, Lac Operon, Lactose, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial, Directed Molecular Evolution, Escherichia coli Proteins, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genetic Fitness, Lac Repressors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review