Cited by 206Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Ancestral origin of ApoE ε4 Alzheimer disease risk in Puerto Rican and African American populations

Open access
Rajabli, Farid, Feliciano, Briseida E., Celis, Katrina, Hamilton-Nelson, Kara L., Whitehead, Patrice L., Adams, Larry D., Bussies, Parker L., Manrique, Clara P. +20 more·2018·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

The ApoE ε4 allele is the most significant genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer disease. The risk conferred by ε4, however, differs across populations, with populations of African ancestry showing lower ε4 risk compared to those of European or Asian ancestry. The cause of this heterogeneity in risk effect is currently unknown; it may be due to environmental or cultural factors correlated with ancestry, or it may be due to genetic variation local to the ApoE region that differs among populations. Exploring these hypotheses may lead to novel, population-specific therapeutics and risk predictions. To test these hypotheses, we analyzed ApoE genotypes and genome-wide array data in individuals from African American and Puerto Rican populations. A total of 1,766 African American and 220 Puerto Rican individuals with late-onset Alzheimer disease, and 3,730 African American and 169 Puerto Rican cognitively healthy individuals (> 65 years) participated in the study. We first assessed average ancestry across the genome ("global" ancestry) and then tested it for interaction with ApoE genotypes. Next, we assessed the ancestral background of ApoE alleles ("local" ancestry) and tested if ancestry local to ApoE influenced Alzheimer disease risk while controlling for global ancestry. Measures of global ancestry showed no interaction with ApoE risk (Puerto Rican: p-value = 0.49; African American: p-value = 0.65). Conversely, ancestry local to the ApoE region showed an interaction with the ApoE ε4 allele in both populations (Puerto Rican: p-value = 0.019; African American: p-value = 0.005). ApoE ε4 alleles on an African background conferred a lower risk than those with a European ancestral background, regardless of population (Puerto Rican: OR = 1.26 on African background, OR = 4.49 on European; African American: OR = 2.34 on African background, OR = 3.05 on European background). Factors contributing to the lower risk effect in the ApoE gene ε4 allele are likely due to ancestry-specific genetic factors near ApoE rather than non-genetic ethnic, cultural, and environmental factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007791

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large population differences in disease risk for well-known alleles such as APOE-ɛ4 in Alzheimer disease highlight the challenge of determining how population differences in effect size might be affected by interaction effects.

    “Large population differences in disease risk for well-known alleles such as APOE-ɛ4 in Alzheimer disease [29, 30] highlight the challenge of determining how population differences in effect size might be affected by interaction effects.”
  • The association between APOEε4 and Alzheimer's disease is weaker among African-American and Hispanic individuals and nonexistent among Nigerian individuals.

    “the association between ε4 and disease is reported to be weaker among African-American and Hispanic individuals [58, 61, 62] and nonexistent among Nigerian individuals [63].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

  • Individuals who inherited the APOEε4 allele from an African ancestor had a lower risk of developing Alzheimer's disease than an individual who inherited APOEε4 from a European ancestor.

    “individuals that inherited the APOEε4 allele (and surrounding region) from an African ancestor had a lower risk of developing AD than an individual who inherited APOEε4 from a European ancestor [62, 102].”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 206

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [3]Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, et al Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993; 261: 921– 923. 8346443
  2. [7]Liu M, Bian C, Zhang J, Wen F. Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and Alzheimer’s disease in Chinese population: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 4383 10.1038/srep04383 24632849 PMC3955907 · DOI
  3. [8]Tang MX, Stern Y, Marder K, Bell K, Gurland B, Lantigua R, et al The APOE-epsilon4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer disease among African Americans, whites, and Hispanics. JAMA. 1998; 279: 751– 755. 9508150
  4. [9]Tang MX, Cross P, Andrews H, Jacobs DM, Small S, Bell K, et al Incidence of AD in African-Americans, Caribbean Hispanics, and Caucasians in northern Manhattan. Neurology. 2001; 56(1) 49– 56. 11148235
  5. [10]Tang MX, Maestre G, Tsai WY, Liu XH, Feng L, Chung WY, et al Relative risk of Alzheimer disease and age-at-onset distributions, based on APOE genotypes among elderly African Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics in New York City. Am J Hum Genet. 1996; 58(3): 574– 584. 8644717 PMC1914582
  6. [11]Sahota A, Yang M, Gao S, Hui SL, Baiyewu O, Gureje O, et al Apolipoprotein E-associated risk for Alzheimer’s disease in the African-American population is genotype dependent. Ann Neurol. 1997; 42: 659– 661. 10.1002/ana.410420418 9382479 · DOI
  7. [12]Hendrie HC, Murrell J, Baiyewu O, Lane KA, Purnell C, Ogunniyi A, et al APOE ε4 and the risk for Alzheimer disease and cognitive decline in African Americans and Yoruba. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014; 26(9) 977– 985 24565289 PMC4012422
  8. [13]Graff-Radford NR, Green RC, Go RC, Hutton ML, Edeki T, Bachman D, et al Association Between Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Alzheimer Disease in African American Subjects. Arch Neurol. 2002; 59(4): 594– 600. 11939894
  9. [14]Farrer LA, Friedland RP, Bowirrat A, Waraska K, Korczyn A, Baldwin CT. Genetic and environmental epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease in arabs residing in Israel. J Mol Neurosci. 2003; 20(3): 207– 12. 10.1385/JMN:20:3:207 14500999 · DOI
  10. [15]Henderson JN, Crook R, Crook J, Hardy J, Onstead L, Carson-Henderson L, et al Apolipoprotein E4 and tau allele frequencies among Choctaw Indians. Neurosci Lett. 2002; 324(1): 77– 9. 11983299
  11. [16]Bowirrat A, Friedland RP, Chapman J, Korczyn AD. The very high prevalence of AD in an Arab population is not explained by APOE epsilon4 allele frequency. Neurology. 2000; 55(5): 731. 10980749
  12. [17]Mersha TB, Abebe T. Self-reported race/ethnicity in the age of genomic research: its potential impact on understanding health disparities. Hum Genomics. 2015; 7: 9: 1. PMC4307746 25563503
  13. [18]Gravlee CC, Non AL, Mulligan CJ. Genetic ancestry, social classification, and racial inequalities in blood pressure in Southeastern Puerto Rico. PLoS One. 2009; 4(9): e6821 10.1371/journal.pone.0006821 19742303 PMC2731885 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [19]Aldrich MC, Selvin S, Wrensch MR, Sison JD, Hansen HM, Quesenberry CP Jr, et al Socioeconomic status and lung cancer: unraveling the contribution of genetic admixture. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(10): e73– 80. 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301370 23948011 PMC3780736 · DOI
  15. [20]Fenesi B, Fang H, Kovacevic A, Oremus M, Raina P, Heisz JJ. Physical Exercise Moderates the Relationship of Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Genotype and Dementia Risk: A Population-Based Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 56(1): 297– 303. 10.3233/JAD-160424 27911292 · DOI
  16. [21]Martin ER, Tunc I, Liu Z, Slifer SH, Beecham A, Beecham G. Properties of global- and local-ancestry adjustments in genetic association tests in admixed populations. Genet Epidemiol. 2018; 42(2): 214– 229. 10.1002/gepi.22103 29288582 PMC5811405 · DOI
  17. [22]Zhu X, Wang H. The Analysis of Ethnic Mixtures. Methods Mol Biol. 2017; 1666: 505– 525. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7274-6_25 28980262 · DOI
  18. [23]Reitz C, Jun G, Naj A, Vardarajan BN, Wang LS, Valladares O, et al Variants in the ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCA7), apolipoprotein E 4, and the risk of late-onset Alzheimer disease in African Americans. JAMA. 2013; 309: 1483– 1492. 10.1001/jama.2013.2973 23571587 PMC3667653 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [25]McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology. 1984; 34(7): 939– 44. 6610841
  20. [27]Wijsman EM, Pankratz ND, Choi Y, Rothstein JH, Faber KM, Cheng R, et al Genome-wide association of familial late-onset Alzheimer’s disease replicates BIN1 and CLU and nominates CUGBP2 in interaction with APOE. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7: e1001308 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001308 21379329 PMC3040659 · DOI
  21. [28]Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3): 189– 98. 1202204
  22. [29]Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987; 48(8): 314– 8. 3611032
  23. [30]Saunders AM, Hulette C, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Schmechel DE, Crain B, Burke JR, et al Specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value of apolipoprotein-E genotyping for sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1996; 348(9020): 90– 93. 8676723
  24. [31]Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 81(3): 559– 75 10.1086/519795 17701901 PMC1950838 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [32]Anderson AC, Petterson FH, Clarke GM, Cardon LR, Morris AP, Zondervan KT. Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5(9): 1564– 1573. 10.1038/nprot.2010.116 21085122 PMC3025522 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [33]Delaneau O, Marchini J. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. Integrating sequence and array data to create an improved 1000 Genomes Project haplotype reference panel. Nature Communications. 2014; 5: 3934 10.1038/ncomms4934 25653097 PMC4338501 · DOI
  27. [35]Maples BK, Gravel S, Kenny EE, Bustamante CD. RFMix: a discriminative modeling approach for rapid and robust local-ancestry inference. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2013; 93: 278– 288 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.020 23910464 PMC3738819 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [36]Price AL, Patterson N, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006; 904– 909. 10.1038/ng1847 16862161 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [39]Dunn OJ. Multiple Comparisons Among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1961; 56 (293): 52– 64.

Authors
Rajabli, F., Feliciano, B. E., Celis, K., Hamilton-Nelson, K. L., Whitehead, P. L., Adams, L. D., Bussies, P. L., Manrique, C. P., Rodriguez, A., Rodriguez, V., Starks, T., Byfield, G. E., Sierra Lopez, C. B., McCauley, J. L., Acosta, H., Chinea, A., Kunkle, B. W., Reitz, C., Farrer, L. A., Schellenberg, G. D., Vardarajan, B. N., Vance, J. M., Cuccaro, M. L., Martin, E. R., Haines, J. L., Byrd, G. S., Beecham, G. W., & Pericak-Vance, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
  • Central University of the Caribbean (PR)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2018-12-05
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
e1007791
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2902965768
Cited by
206
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (RF1-AG054074, U01-AG032984, U01-AG052410)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, genetic risk, local ancestry, African American population, Puerto Rican population
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Puerto Rico, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Case-Control Studies, Apolipoprotein E4, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review