The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all
Open accessAbstract
Plant mitochondrial genomes are usually assembled and displayed as circular maps based on the widely-held view across the broad community of life scientists that circular genome-sized molecules are the primary form of plant mitochondrial DNA, despite the understanding by plant mitochondrial researchers that this is an inaccurate and outdated concept. Many plant mitochondrial genomes have one or more pairs of large repeats that can act as sites for inter- or intramolecular recombination, leading to multiple alternative arrangements (isoforms). Most mitochondrial genomes have been assembled using methods unable to capture the complete spectrum of isoforms within a species, leading to an incomplete inference of their structure and recombinational activity. To document and investigate underlying reasons for structural diversity in plant mitochondrial DNA, we used long-read (PacBio) and short-read (Illumina) sequencing data to assemble and compare mitochondrial genomes of domesticated (Lactuca sativa) and wild (L. saligna and L. serriola) lettuce species. We characterized a comprehensive, complex set of isoforms within each species and compared genome structures between species. Physical analysis of L. sativa mtDNA molecules by fluorescence microscopy revealed a variety of linear, branched, and circular structures. The mitochondrial genomes for L. sativa and L. serriola were identical in sequence and arrangement and differed substantially from L. saligna, indicating that the mitochondrial genome structure did not change during domestication. From the isoforms in our data, we infer that recombination occurs at repeats of all sizes at variable frequencies. The differences in genome structure between L. saligna and the two other Lactuca species can be largely explained by rare recombination events that rearranged the structure. Our data demonstrate that representations of plant mitochondrial genomes as simple, circular molecules are not accurate descriptions of their true nature and that in reality plant mitochondrial DNA is a complex, dynamic mixture of forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063
Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs
Zerbino, D. R., & Birney, E. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107 · Cited by 9,491
Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k -mer weighting and repeat separation
Koren, S., Walenz, B. P., Berlin, K., Miller, J. R., Bergman, N. H., & Phillippy, A. M. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.215087.116 · Cited by 7,304
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees
Chang, S., Puryear, J., & Cairney, J. (1993) · Plant Molecular Biology Reporter · doi:10.1007/bf02670468 · Cited by 3,580
MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system
Marçais, G., Delcher, A. L., Phillippy, A. M., Coston, R., Salzberg, S. L., & Zimin, A. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944 · Cited by 2,484
Wolfe, K. H., Li, W. H., & Sharp, P. M. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054 · Cited by 2,317
Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues
Rogers, S. O., & Bendich, A. J. (1985) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00020088 · Cited by 2,017
Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing
Chin, C.-S., Peluso, P., Sedlazeck, F. J., Nattestad, M., Concepcion, G. T., Clum, A., Dunn, C., O'Malley, R., Figueroa-Balderas, R., Morales-Cruz, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4035 · Cited by 1,904
Cited by
Chloroplot: An Online Program for the Versatile Plotting of Organelle Genomes
Zheng, S., Poczai, P., Hyvönen, J., Tang, J., & Amiryousefi, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.576124 · Cited by 382
Plant organellar genomes: much done, much more to do
Wang, J., Kan, S., Liao, X., Zhou, J., Tembrock, L. R., Daniell, H., Jin, S., & Wu, Z. (2024) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.12.014 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozik, A., Rowan, B. A., Lavelle, D., Berke, L., Schranz, M. E., Michelmore, R. W., & Christensen, A. C.
- Venue
- PLOS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1008373
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2970442701
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 26.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008373
- The paper
- Kozik, A., Rowan, B. A., Lavelle, D., Berke, L., Schranz, M. E., Michelmore, R. W., & Christensen, A. C. (2019). The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. PLOS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.