Transcriptome and epigenome diversity and plasticity of muscle stem cells following transplantation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Adult skeletal muscles are maintained during homeostasis and regenerated upon injury by muscle stem cells (MuSCs). A heterogeneity in self-renewal, differentiation and regeneration properties has been reported for MuSCs based on their anatomical location. Although MuSCs derived from extraocular muscles (EOM) have a higher regenerative capacity than those derived from limb muscles, the molecular determinants that govern these differences remain undefined. Here we show that EOM and limb MuSCs have distinct DNA methylation signatures associated with enhancers of location-specific genes, and that the EOM transcriptome is reprogrammed following transplantation into a limb muscle environment. Notably, EOM MuSCs expressed host-site specific positional Hox codes after engraftment and self-renewal within the host muscle. However, about 10% of EOM-specific genes showed engraftment-resistant expression, pointing to cell-intrinsic molecular determinants of the higher engraftment potential of EOM MuSCs. Our results underscore the molecular diversity of distinct MuSC populations and molecularly define their plasticity in response to microenvironmental cues. These findings provide insights into strategies designed to improve the functional capacity of MuSCs in the context of regenerative medicine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In muscle, MuSCs exist as a heterogeneous quiescent population in adult mice, with changes in heterogeneity with ageing.
“In muscle, MuSCs also exist as a heterogeneous quiescent population in adult mice30–33, with changes in heterogeneity with ageing32,34,35.”
From Ageing and rejuvenation of tissue stem cells and their niches (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
In muscle, DNA methylation changes with ageing in MuSCs, with increased heterogeneity (accompanied by transcriptional heterogeneity), suggesting an epigenetic drift with ageing.
“In muscle, DNA methylation changes with ageing in MuSCs, with increased heterogeneity (accompanied by transcriptional heterogeneity), suggesting an epigenetic drift with ageing33,67.”
From Ageing and rejuvenation of tissue stem cells and their niches (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 100 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [52]Kelly RG, Jerome-Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 regulates branchiometric myogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13: 2829– 2840. 10.1093/hmg/ddh304 15385444 · DOI
- Authors
- Evano, B., Gill, D., Hernando-Herraez, I., Comai, G., Stubbs, T. M., Commere, P.-H., Reik, W., & Tajbakhsh, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Babraham Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reik, Wolf
- Tajbakhsh, Shahragim
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2020-10-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e1009022
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC7657492
- OpenAlex
- W3096349398
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2020-11-11)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX73, ANR-10, ANR-10-LABX, ANR-10-LABX-0073, 10-LABX-73)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR-10-LABX-73)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/B/000C0422, CBBS/E/B/000C0425)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- muscle stem cells, extraocular muscles, limb muscles, DNA methylation, enhancers, engraftment, transcriptional reprogramming, epigenetic plasticity, muscle regeneration, microenvironment, cellular heterogeneity, self-renewal
- MeSH terms
- Cell Plasticity, Epigenome, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Extremities, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Regeneration, Stem Cells, Genetic Variation, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Cell Lineage, Muscle Cells, Myoblasts, Stem Cell Transplantation, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review