Cited by 40Muscle Physiology and DisordersCongenital heart defects researchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Transcriptome and epigenome diversity and plasticity of muscle stem cells following transplantation

Open access
Evano, Brendan, Gill, Diljeet, Hernando-Herraez, Irene, Comai, Glenda, Stubbs, Thomas M., Commere, Pierre-Henri, Reik, Wolf, Tajbakhsh, Shahragim·2020·PLOS Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Adult skeletal muscles are maintained during homeostasis and regenerated upon injury by muscle stem cells (MuSCs). A heterogeneity in self-renewal, differentiation and regeneration properties has been reported for MuSCs based on their anatomical location. Although MuSCs derived from extraocular muscles (EOM) have a higher regenerative capacity than those derived from limb muscles, the molecular determinants that govern these differences remain undefined. Here we show that EOM and limb MuSCs have distinct DNA methylation signatures associated with enhancers of location-specific genes, and that the EOM transcriptome is reprogrammed following transplantation into a limb muscle environment. Notably, EOM MuSCs expressed host-site specific positional Hox codes after engraftment and self-renewal within the host muscle. However, about 10% of EOM-specific genes showed engraftment-resistant expression, pointing to cell-intrinsic molecular determinants of the higher engraftment potential of EOM MuSCs. Our results underscore the molecular diversity of distinct MuSC populations and molecularly define their plasticity in response to microenvironmental cues. These findings provide insights into strategies designed to improve the functional capacity of MuSCs in the context of regenerative medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In muscle, MuSCs exist as a heterogeneous quiescent population in adult mice, with changes in heterogeneity with ageing.

    “In muscle, MuSCs also exist as a heterogeneous quiescent population in adult mice30–33, with changes in heterogeneity with ageing32,34,35.”
  • In muscle, DNA methylation changes with ageing in MuSCs, with increased heterogeneity (accompanied by transcriptional heterogeneity), suggesting an epigenetic drift with ageing.

    “In muscle, DNA methylation changes with ageing in MuSCs, with increased heterogeneity (accompanied by transcriptional heterogeneity), suggesting an epigenetic drift with ageing33,67.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 100 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [52]Kelly RG, Jerome-Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. The del22q11.2 candidate gene Tbx1 regulates branchiometric myogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13: 2829– 2840. 10.1093/hmg/ddh304 15385444 · DOI

Authors
Evano, B., Gill, D., Hernando-Herraez, I., Comai, G., Stubbs, T. M., Commere, P.-H., Reik, W., & Tajbakhsh, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Babraham Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Reik, Wolf
  • Tajbakhsh, Shahragim
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2020-10-30
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
e1009022
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W3096349398
Cited by
40
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX73, ANR-10, ANR-10-LABX, ANR-10-LABX-0073, 10-LABX-73)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR-10-LABX-73)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/B/000C0422, CBBS/E/B/000C0425)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
muscle stem cells, extraocular muscles, limb muscles, DNA methylation, enhancers, engraftment, transcriptional reprogramming, epigenetic plasticity, muscle regeneration, microenvironment, cellular heterogeneity, self-renewal
MeSH terms
Cell Plasticity, Epigenome, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Extremities, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Regeneration, Stem Cells, Genetic Variation, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Cell Lineage, Muscle Cells, Myoblasts, Stem Cell Transplantation, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review