Missense variants causing Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome preferentially occur in the KMT2A-CXXC domain and are accurately classified using AlphaFold2
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome (WDSTS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by de novo variants in KMT2A , which encodes a multi-domain histone methyltransferase. To gain insight into the currently unknown pathogenesis of WDSTS, we examined the spatial distribution of likely WDSTS-causing variants across the 15 different domains of KMT2A. Compared to variants in healthy controls, WDSTS variants exhibit a 61.9-fold overrepresentation within the CXXC domain–which mediates binding to unmethylated CpGs–suggesting a major role for this domain in mediating the phenotype. In contrast, we find no significant overrepresentation within the catalytic SET domain. Corroborating these results, we find that hippocampal neurons from Kmt2a -deficient mice demonstrate disrupted histone methylation (H3K4me1 and H3K4me3) preferentially at CpG-rich regions, but this has no systematic impact on gene expression. Motivated by these results, we combine accurate prediction of the CXXC domain structure by AlphaFold2 with prior biological knowledge to develop a classification scheme for missense variants in the CXXC domain. Our classifier achieved 92.6% positive and 92.9% negative predictive value on a hold-out test set. This classification performance enabled us to subsequently perform an in silico saturation mutagenesis and classify a total of 445 variants according to their functional effects. Our results yield a novel insight into the mechanistic basis of WDSTS and provide an example of how AlphaFold2 can contribute to the in silico characterization of variant effects with very high accuracy, suggesting a paradigm potentially applicable to many other Mendelian disorders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Dorighi, K. M., Swigut, T., Henriques, T., Bhanu, N. V., Scruggs, B. S., Nady, N., Still, C. D., Garcia, B. A., Adelman, K., & Wysocka, J. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.018 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
KMT2A and KMT2B Mediate Memory Function by Affecting Distinct Genomic Regions
Kerimoglu, C., Sakib, M. S., Jain, G., Benito, E., Burkhardt, S., Capece, V., Kaurani, L., Halder, R., Agís-Balboa, R. C., Stilling, R., et al. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.072 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Reynisdottir, T., Anderson, K. J., Boukas, L., & Bjornsson, H. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Iceland (IS)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boukas, Leandros
- Bjornsson, Hans Tomas
- Venue
- PLOS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2022-06-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1010278
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC9249231
- OpenAlex
- W4283269607
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2022-07-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wiedemann-Steiner Foundation
- Louma G. Foundation
- Icelandic Research Fund (#217988, #195835, #206806)
- Icelandic Technology Development Fund (#2010588)
- National Institutes of Health (#R01GM121459)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome, KMT2A, CXXC domain, missense mutations, de novo mutations, histone methyltransferase, H3K4 methylation, neurodevelopmental disorders, variant effect prediction, AlphaFold2, hippocampal neurons, monogenic disorders
- MeSH terms
- Abnormalities, Multiple, Protein Domains, Animals, Growth Disorders, Hypertrichosis, Intellectual Disability, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Syndrome, Protein Folding, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Mutation, Missense, Mice, Myeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review