Cited by 1Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genome wide association study meta-analysis of neuropathologic lesions of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias in a multi-site autopsy cohort

Open access
Cholerton, Brenna, Godrich, Dana, Pasteris, Jeremy, Rivero, Joe, Martin, Eden R., Kunkle, Brian W., Naj, Adam C., Hamilton-Nelson, Kara L. +23 more·2026·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

Understanding the genetic foundations of dementia is critical to unraveling its complex molecular basis. Given that a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia often results from interplay between multiple underlying neuropathologic co-morbidities, previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of clinically diagnosed AD are restricted in their ability to translate genetic associations to potential targeted therapeutics. The current study seeks to address these limitations by presenting the largest GWAS to date (n = 12,509) of neuropathologic hallmarks of AD and AD related dementias (ADRDs). We further performed a candidate-variant analysis using loci previously identified in GWAS of clinically diagnosed AD dementia and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Finally, we conducted heritability and genetic correlation analyses using linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression. We found broad genome-wide significant associations with APOE across AD and ADRDs but not cerebrovascular disease and vascular brain injury. We further identified 12 significant loci across 10 neuropathologic phenotypes, including 5 loci previously implicated in GWAS of clinical AD and ADRDs (variants on BIN1, PICALM/ EED, TMEM106B, GRN, and SNCA/ SNCA-AS1 ) and 7 novel genome-wide associations (variants on EPHA5, PSMG1, LINC00276, VAPA, LINC00290, DOCK4 and SLAIN2/ SLC10A4 ). Our analysis of AD and PD clinical candidate variants demonstrated several that were associated with AD neuropathologic change and Lewy body disease, as well as substantial overlap with neuropathologic lesions other than the primary neuropathologic hallmarks of these diseases. Heritability analyses demonstrated heritability that was high for amyloid plaques (78%) relative to prior clinical AD heritability analyses, intermediate for TDP-43 inclusions (41%), and low for remaining AD and ADRD pathologic features. This study underscores the importance of investigating the underlying neuropathologic hallmarks of AD and ADRDs as a step toward refining the translation of genetic associations to biomarker interpretation and development of targeted therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012170

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 80 · Cited by 1

Authors
Cholerton, B., Godrich, D., Pasteris, J., Rivero, J., Martin, E. R., Kunkle, B. W., Naj, A. C., Hamilton-Nelson, K. L., Wang, H., Lee, W.-P., Dumitrescu, L., Hohman, T. J., Mayeux, R., Larson, E. B., Crane, P. K., Keene, C. D., Latimer, C. S., Mukherjee, S., Kofler, J. K., Kamboh, M. I., Bennett, D. A., Molina-Porcel, L., Cuccaro, M., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Rundek, T., Scott, W. K., Kukull, W., Schellenberg, G., Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium, Beecham, G. W., & Montine, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Beecham, Gary W.
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2026-06-29
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
e1012170
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W7166556253
Cited by
1
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG062695, AG019085, AG032984, AG036528, AG041689, AG016976, AG026395, AG041797, AG008702, AG015473, AG010161, AG027944, AG010491, AG021547, AG019757, AG066567, AG0066468, AG0064877, AG007562, AG023651)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, amyloid plaques, TDP-43 inclusions, Lewy body disease, apolipoprotein E, genetic correlation, heritability, genetic susceptibility loci, BIN1, PICALM, TMEM106B, gene regulatory networks, SNCA, Parkinson's disease, candidate variants
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Autopsy, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review