Cited by 0Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Fast probabilistic whitening transformation for ultra-high dimensional genetic data

Open access
Hoffman, Gabriel E., Dillard, Christian P., Girdhar, Kiran, Roussos, Panos·2026·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

Statistical methods often make assumptions about independence between the samples or features of a dataset, yet correlation structure is ubiquitous in real data. In statistical genetics, correlation between regression summary statistics due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) between nearby variants complicates downstream analysis. Many methods use LD reference panels to account for this correlation. Whitening transformations comprise a family of methods to remove correlation structure, and are used implicitly by many common models. Here we propose a probabilistic model for data whitening, and propose parameter estimates and efficient algorithms to improve statistical and computational performance. In an application to impute z-statistics from unobserved genetic variants from a genome-wide association study of schizophrenia, the probabilistic whitening transformation, had the lowest mean square error while being up to an order of magnitude faster than other methods. Using this approach, we also identify tandem repeats that explain genetic regulatory signals for disease-relevant genes. Analyses are implemented in our novel open source R packages decorrelate and imputez .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1012320

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hoffman, G. E., Dillard, C. P., Girdhar, K., & Roussos, P.
Affiliations
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Gabriel E.
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2026-10-28
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
e1012320
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W7224104051
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U24AG087563)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U24AG087563)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
whitening, probabilistic models, linkage disequilibrium, genotype imputation, Z-statistic, genome-wide association study, schizophrenia, tandem repeats, ultra-high dimensional data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review