The supply is there. So why can’t pregnant and breastfeeding women in rural India get the COVID-19 vaccine?
Open accessAbstract
Despite COVID-19 vaccines being available to pregnant women in India since summer 2021, little is known about vaccine uptake among this high need population. We conducted mixed methods research with pregnant and recently delivered rural women in northern India, consisting of 300 phone surveys and 15 in-depth interviews, in November 2021. Only about a third of respondents were vaccinated, however, about half of unvaccinated respondents reported that they would get vaccinated now if they could. Fears of harm to the unborn baby or young infant were common (22% of unvaccinated women). However, among unvaccinated women who wanted to get vaccinated, the most common barrier reported was that their health care provider refused to provide them the vaccine. Gender barriers and social norms also played a role, with family members restricting women’s access. Trust in the health system was high, however, women were most often getting information about COVID-19 vaccines from sources that they did not trust, and they knew they were getting potentially poor-quality information. Qualitative data shed light on the barriers women faced from their family and health care providers but described how as more people got the vaccine that norms were changing. These findings highlight how pregnant women in India have lower vaccination rates than the general population, and while vaccine hesitancy does play a role, structural barriers from the health care system also limit access to vaccines. Interventions must be developed that target household decision-makers and health providers at the community level, and that take advantage of the trust that rural women already have in their health care providers and the government. It is essential to think beyond vaccine hesitancy and think at the system level when addressing this missed opportunity to vaccinate high risk pregnant women in this setting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decisions about women's healthcare and vaccination are often made at the household level, with input from husbands, in-laws, and other family members.
“Decisions about women’s healthcare and vaccination are thus often made at the household level, with input from husbands, in-laws, and other family members [50–52].”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- [2]Bhargava R, Jain G, Bhargava A, Gupta S. COVID-19 Vaccination drive: Impact on the acceptance of vaccine among the general population of India. Journal of Management Research and Analysis. 2021; 8: 61– 9.
- [3]Viswanath K, Hiremath RN, Basra SS, Chourey N. Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination drive: The perceptions and acceptance of vaccination among health care workers. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2021; 177– 81.
- [4]Ryan NE, El Ayadi AM. A call for a gender-responsive, intersectional approach to address COVID-19. Global Public Health. Taylor & Francis; 2020; 15: 1404– 12. 32633628
- [5]Kushwaha S, Khanna P, Rajagopal V, Kiran T. Biological attributes of age and gender variations in Indian COVID-19 cases: A retrospective data analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021; 11: 100788. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100788 34079918 PMC8159626 · DOI
- [6]Biswas M, Rahaman S, Biswas TK, Haque Z, Ibrahim B. Association of Sex, Age, and Comorbidities with Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INT. Karger Publishers; 2021; 64: 36– 47. PMC7801974 33296901
- [7]Vouga M, Favre G, Martinez-Perez O, Pomar L, Acebal LF, Abascal-Saiz A, et al. Maternal outcomes and risk factors for COVID-19 severity among pregnant women. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 13898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92357-y 34230507 PMC8260739 · DOI
- [8]Wei SQ, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Liu S, Auger N. The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2021; 193: E540– 8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202604 33741725 PMC8084555 · DOI
- [9]Stock SJ, Carruthers J, Calvert C, Denny C, Donaghy J, Goulding A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination rates in pregnant women in Scotland. Nat Med. 2022; PMC8938271 35027756
- [11]Skjefte M, Ngirbabul M, Akeju O, Escudero D, Hernandez-Diaz S, Wyszynski DF, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women and mothers of young children: results of a survey in 16 countries. European journal of epidemiology. Springer; 2021; 36: 197– 211. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00728-6 33649879 PMC7920402 · DOI
- [12]Januszek SM, Faryniak-Zuzak A, Barnaś E, Łoziński T, Góra T, Siwiec N, et al. The Approach of Pregnant Women to Vaccination Based on a COVID-19 Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57: 977. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090977 34577900 PMC8468958 · DOI
- [13]Panda DS, Giri RK, Nagarajappa AK, Basha S. Covid-19 vaccine, acceptance, and concern of safety from public perspective in the state of Odisha, India. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. Taylor & Francis; 2021; 17: 3333– 7. PMC8437537 34010097
- [14]Danabal KGM, Magesh SS, Saravanan S, Gopichandran V. Attitude towards COVID 19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy in urban and rural communities in Tamil Nadu, India–a community based survey. BMC Health Services Research. 2021; 21: 994. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07037-4 34548088 PMC8453251 · DOI
- [15]Jain J, Saurabh S, Kumar P, Verma MK, Goel AD, Gupta MK, et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among medical students in India. Epidemiology & Infection [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 14];149. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/covid19-vaccine-hesitancy-among-medical-students-in-india/B1AA32D7F818FDA6330FDED446634E25 PMC8185413 34011421
- [16]Umakanthan S, Patil S, Subramaniam N, Sharma R. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Resistance in India Explored through a Population-Based Longitudinal Survey. Vaccines. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2021; 9: 1064. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101064 34696172 PMC8537475 · DOI
- [17]Kumari A, Mahey R, Kachhawa G, Kumari R, Bhatla N. Knowledge, attitude, perceptions, and concerns of pregnant and lactating women regarding COVID-19 vaccination: A cross-sectional survey of 313 participants from a tertiary care centre of North India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2022; 16: 102449. PMC8896870 35279009
- [18]Diamond-Smith N, Sharma P, Duggal M, Gill N, Gupta J, Kumar V, et al. The supply is there. So why can’t pregnant and breastfeeding women in rural India get the COVID-19 vaccine? Dryad; 2022. PMC10022347 36962889
- [20]Joshi A, Kaur M, Kaur R, Grover A, Nash D, El-Mohandes A. Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Intention, and Hesitancy: A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 26];9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2021.698111 PMC8414566 34485229 · DOI
- [22]Gopalakrishnan L, Buback L, Fernald L, Walker D, Diamond-Smith N, Consortium in addition to TCE. Using mHealth to improve health care delivery in India: A qualitative examination of the perspectives of community health workers and beneficiaries. PLOS ONE. Public Library of Science; 2020; 15: e0227451. PMC6961923 31940326
- [23]Giduthuri JG, Purohit V, Kudale A, Utzinger J, Schindler C, Weiss MG. Antenatal influenza vaccination in urban Pune, India: clinician and community stakeholders’ awareness, priorities, and practices. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. Taylor & Francis; 2021; 17: 1211– 22. PMC8018408 32966146
- [24]Kusuma YS, Kant S. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and its determinants: A cross-sectional study among the socioeconomically disadvantaged communities living in Delhi, India. Vaccine: X. 2022; 11: 100171. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100171 35607603 PMC9116429 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Coursey, K., Muralidhar, K., Srinivas, V., Jaykrishna, P., Begum, F., Ningaiah, N., Lee, S.-J., & Madhivanan, P. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19485-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Decisions about women’s healthcare and vaccination are thus often made at the household level, with input from husbands, in-laws, and other family members [50–52].”
Background
- Authors
- Diamond-Smith, N. G., Sharma, P., Duggal, M., Gill, N., Gupta, J., Kumar, V., Kaur, J., Singh, P., Vosburg, K. B., & El Ayadi, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
- Foundation for Survival of Women and Children (IN)
- Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi (IN)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Global Public Health
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2022-12-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e0001321
- ISSN
- 2767-3375 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10022347
- OpenAlex
- W4311652762
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLOS Global Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Vaccine Confidence Fund (Grant ID VCF – 028)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- COVID-19 vaccination, pregnant women, lactating women, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake, rural India, family decision-making, social norms, trust in health system, vaccine information sources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review