The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serum Uric Acid and Coronary Heart Disease in 9,458 Incident Cases and 155,084 Controls: Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested throughout the past fifty years that serum uric acid concentrations can help predict the future risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but the epidemiological evidence is uncertain. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We report a "nested" case-control comparison within a prospective study in Reykjavik, Iceland, using baseline values of serum uric acid in 2,456 incident CHD cases and in 3,962 age- and sex-matched controls, plus paired serum uric acid measurements taken at baseline and, on average, 12 y later in 379 participants. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of 15 other prospective studies in eight countries conducted in essentially general populations. Compared with individuals in the bottom third of baseline measurements of serum uric acid in the Reykjavik study, those in the top third had an age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio for CHD of 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.58) which fell to 1.12 (CI, 0.97-1.30) after adjustment for smoking and other established risk factors. Overall, in a combined analysis of 9,458 cases and 155,084 controls in all 16 relevant prospective studies, the odds ratio was 1.13 (CI, 1.07-1.20), but it was only 1.02 (CI, 0.91-1.14) in the eight studies with more complete adjustment for possible confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of serum uric acid levels is unlikely to enhance usefully the prediction of CHD, and this factor is unlikely to be a major determinant of the disease in general populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jonsdottir (2002) · Journal of Cardiovascular Risk · doi:10.1097/00043798-200204000-00001 · Cited by 61
Cited by
Hyperuricemia and coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Kim, S. Y., Guevara, J. P., Kim, K. M., Choi, H. K., Heitjan, D. F., & Albert, D. A. (2010) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20065 · Cited by 671
Hyperuricaemia and gout in cardiovascular, metabolic and kidney disease
Borghi, C., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Johnson, R. J., Kielstein, J. T., Lurbe, E., Mancia, G., Redon, J., Stack, A. G., & Tsioufis, K. P. (2020) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2020.07.006 · Cited by 435
Uric acid, hyperuricemia and vascular diseases
Jin, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/3950 · Cited by 406
Uric Acid Reduction Rectifies Prehypertension in Obese Adolescents
Soletsky, B., & Feig, D. I. (2012) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.112.196980 · Cited by 334
Fructose Intake, Serum Uric Acid, and Cardiometabolic Disorders: A Critical Review
Caliceti, C., Calabria, D., Roda, A., & Cicero, A. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9040395 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, J. G., Juzwishin, K. D. M., Eiriksdottir, G., Gudnason, V., & Danesh, J.
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-03-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e76
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2150619497
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum Uric Acid and Coronary Heart Disease in 9,458 Incident Cases and 155,084 Controls: Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020076
- The paper
- Wheeler, J. G., Juzwishin, K. D. M., Eiriksdottir, G., Gudnason, V., & Danesh, J. (2005). Serum Uric Acid and Coronary Heart Disease in 9,458 Incident Cases and 155,084 Controls: Prospective Study and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.