Cited by 314Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alcohol Intake and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review Implementing a Mendelian Randomization Approach

Open access
Chen, Lina, Davey Smith, George, Harbord, Roger M, Lewis, Sarah J·2008·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol has been reported to be a common and modifiable risk factor for hypertension. However, observational studies are subject to confounding by other behavioural and sociodemographic factors, while clinical trials are difficult to implement and have limited follow-up time. Mendelian randomization can provide robust evidence on the nature of this association by use of a common polymorphism in aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) as a surrogate for measuring alcohol consumption. ALDH2 encodes a major enzyme involved in alcohol metabolism. Individuals homozygous for the null variant (*2*2) experience adverse symptoms when drinking alcohol and consequently drink considerably less alcohol than wild-type homozygotes (*1*1) or heterozygotes. We hypothesise that this polymorphism may influence the risk of hypertension by affecting alcohol drinking behaviour. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out fixed effect meta-analyses of the ALDH2 genotype with blood pressure (five studies, n = 7,658) and hypertension (three studies, n = 4,219) using studies identified via systematic review. In males, we obtained an overall odds ratio of 2.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-3.55, p = 4.8 x 10(-6)) for hypertension comparing *1*1 with *2*2 homozygotes and an odds ratio of 1.72 (95% CI 1.17-2.52, p = 0.006) comparing heterozygotes (surrogate for moderate drinkers) with *2*2 homozygotes. Systolic blood pressure was 7.44 mmHg (95% CI 5.39-9.49, p = 1.1 x 10(-12)) greater among *1*1 than among *2*2 homozygotes, and 4.24 mmHg (95% CI 2.18-6.31, p = 0.00005) greater among heterozygotes than among *2*2 homozygotes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that alcohol intake has a marked effect on blood pressure and the risk of hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050052

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow Diagram Showing Reasons for Exclusion and Number of Papers Excluded
Figure 1 Flow Diagram Showing Reasons for Exclusion and Number of Papers ExcludedCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Forest Plot of Studies of ALDH2 Genotype and Hypertension
Figure 2 Forest Plot of Studies of ALDH2 Genotype and HypertensionCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Forest Plot of Studies of ALDH2 Genotype and Blood Pressure
Figure 3 Forest Plot of Studies of ALDH2 Genotype and Blood PressureCC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Mean Blood Pressure in Each Genotype Plotted against Mean Alcohol Consumption in Each Genotype in the Three Studies That Gave Data for Both Relationships Top graph: systolic blood pressure. Bottom graph: diastolic blood pressure. Larger plotting symbols indicate a greater number of individuals.
Figure 4 Mean Blood Pressure in Each Genotype Plotted against Mean Alcohol Consumption in Each Genotype in the Three Studies That Gave Data for Both Relationships Top graph: systolic blood pressure. Bottom graph: diastolic blood pressure. Larger plotting symbols indicate a greater number of individuals.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Forest Plot of Instrumental Variable Estimates of Alcohol–Blood Pressure Effect in Males Obtained Using Genotype as an Instrument for Alcohol
Figure 5 Forest Plot of Instrumental Variable Estimates of Alcohol–Blood Pressure Effect in Males Obtained Using Genotype as an Instrument for AlcoholCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Marmot, 1994, BMJ, 308, 1263
  2. Patel, 2006, J Hum Hypertens, 20, 733
  3. Fuchs, 2001, Hypertension, 37, 1242
  4. Moore, 1990, Am J Hypertens, 3, 1
  5. Davey Smith, 2003, Int J Epidemiol, 32, 1
  6. Bosron, 1986, Hepatology, 6, 502
  7. Yoshida, 1984, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 81, 258
  8. Enomoto, 1991, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 15, 141
  9. Lewis, 2005, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14, 1967
  10. Pittler, 2003, CMAJ, 169, 1269
  11. Mackenzie, 2005, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 25, 1891
  12. Hashimoto, 2002, Clin Chem, 48, 1043
  13. Okayama, 1994, J Hum Hypertens, 8, 205
  14. Egger, 1997, BMJ, 315, 629
  15. Begg, 1994, Biometrics, 50, 1088
  16. Amamoto, 2002, Hypertens Res, 25, 857
  17. Takagi, 2001, Hypertens Res, 24, 365
  18. Tsuritani, 1995, Am J Hypertens, 8, 1053
  19. Howes, 1986, J Hypertens, 4, 421
  20. Rosito, 1999, Am J Hypertens, 12, 236
  21. Beulens, 2007, Ann Intern Med, 146, 10
  22. Westerterp-Plantenga, 1999, Am J Clin Nutr, 69, 205
  23. Lukasiewicz, 2005, Public Health Nutr, 8, 315
  24. Sakurai, 2006, Hypertens Res, 29, 75
  25. Eriksson, 2001, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 25, 15S
  26. Saito, 2003, J Hypertens, 21, 1097
  27. Yamada, 2006, J Hum Genet, 51, 104
  28. Davey Smith, 2005, Lancet, 366, 1679
  29. Iwai, 2004, J Hypertens, 22, 1119

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 314

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L., Davey Smith, G., Harbord, R. M., & Lewis, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Sarah J
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2008-03-04
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
e52
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2097040757
Cited by
314
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
alcohol consumption, blood pressure, hypertension, ALDH2, ALDH2 polymorphism, genetic susceptibility, alcohol metabolism, systolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Alcohol Dehydrogenase, Alcohol Drinking, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review