International funding for malaria control in relation to populations at risk of stable Plasmodium falciparum transmission
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The international financing of malaria control has increased significantly in the last ten years in parallel with calls to halve the malaria burden by the year 2015. The allocation of funds to countries should reflect the size of the populations at risk of infection, disease, and death. To examine this relationship, we compare an audit of international commitments with an objective assessment of national need: the population at risk of stable Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in 2007. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The national distributions of populations at risk of stable P. falciparum transmission were projected to the year 2007 for each of 87 P. falciparum-endemic countries. Systematic online- and literature-based searches were conducted to audit the international funding commitments made for malaria control by major donors between 2002 and 2007. These figures were used to generate annual malaria funding allocation (in US dollars) per capita population at risk of stable P. falciparum in 2007. Almost US$1 billion are distributed each year to the 1.4 billion people exposed to stable P. falciparum malaria risk. This is less than US$1 per person at risk per year. Forty percent of this total comes from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Substantial regional and national variations in disbursements exist. While the distribution of funds is found to be broadly appropriate, specific high population density countries receive disproportionately less support to scale up malaria control. Additionally, an inadequacy of current financial commitments by the international community was found: under-funding could be from 50% to 450%, depending on which global assessment of the cost required to scale up malaria control is adopted. CONCLUSIONS: Without further increases in funding and appropriate targeting of global malaria control investment it is unlikely that international goals to halve disease burdens by 2015 will be achieved. Moreover, the additional financing requirements to move from malaria control to malaria elimination have not yet been considered by the scientific or international community.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The past decade has seen a steady increase in commitment to malaria control by the international community.
“The past decade has seen a steady increase in commitment to malaria control by the international community (Snow et al. 2008).”
From Global Status of DDT and Its Alternatives for Use in Vector Control to Prevent Disease (2009) · cites this paper as Snow et al. 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Snow, R. W., Guerra, C. A., Mutheu, J. J., & Hay, S. I.
- Affiliations
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
- Corresponding author
- Snow, Robert W
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-07-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e142
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- PMC
- PMC2488181
- OpenAlex
- W2046378159
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development
- Wellcome Trust (076951, 079080, 079091)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
- Keywords
- Plasmodium falciparum, vulnerable populations, Global Fund, malaria elimination, donor commitments
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antimalarials, Disease Outbreaks, International Cooperation, Plasmodium falciparum, Population, Risk Factors, Global Health, Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria Vaccines, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review