Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement

Open access
MacPherson, Hugh, Altman, Douglas G., Hammerschlag, Richard, Youping, Li, Taixiang, Wu, White, Adrian, Moher, David, on behalf of the STRICTA Revision Group·2010·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

The STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) were published in five journals in 2001 and 2002. These guidelines, in the form of a checklist and explanations for use by authors and journal editors, were designed to improve reporting of acupuncture trials, particularly the interventions, thereby facilitating their interpretation and replication. Subsequent reviews of the application and impact of STRICTA have highlighted the value of STRICTA as well as scope for improvements and revision. To manage the revision process a collaboration between the STRICTA Group, the CONSORT Group, and the Chinese Cochrane Centre was developed in 2008. An expert panel with 47 participants was convened that provided electronic feedback on a revised draft of the checklist. At a subsequent face-to-face meeting in Freiburg, a group of 21 participants further revised the STRICTA checklist and planned dissemination. The new STRICTA checklist, which is an official extension of CONSORT, includes six items and 17 sub-items. These set out reporting guidelines for the acupuncture rationale, the details of needling, the treatment regimen, other components of treatment, the practitioner background, and the control or comparator interventions. In addition, and as part of this revision process, the explanations for each item have been elaborated, and examples of good reporting for each item are provided. In addition, the word "controlled" in STRICTA is replaced by "clinical," to indicate that STRICTA is applicable to a broad range of clinical evaluation designs, including uncontrolled outcome studies and case reports. It is intended that the revised STRICTA, in conjunction with both the main CONSORT Statement and extension for nonpharmacologic treatment, will raise the quality of reporting of clinical trials of acupuncture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. H MacPherson, 2002, Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: the STRICTA statement., Med Acupunct, 13, 9
  2. Lee Hyangsook, 2002, Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture: The STRICTA Recommendations., J Korean Soc Acupunct Moxibustion, 19, 134
  3. Jianping Liu, 2005, Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture: The STRICTA Recommendations., Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, 25, 556
  4. Xuemei Liu, 2003, Improving the Quality of Reports in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture by Using CONSORT and STRICTA., Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, 23, 699
  5. AC Ahn, 2007, Two styles of acupuncture for treating painful diabetic neuropathy - a pilot randomised control trial., Acupunct Med, 25, 11, 10.1136/aim.25.1-2.11 · doi:10.1136/aim.25.1-2.11
  6. H MacPherson, 2004, Acupuncture for low back pain: traditional diagnosis and treatment of 148 patients in a clinical trial., Complement Ther Med, 12, 38, 10.1016/S0965-2299(03)00125-0 · doi:10.1016/s0965-2299(03)00125-0
  7. K Itoh, 2008, Trigger point acupuncture for treatment of knee osteoarthritis - a preliminary RCT for a pragmatic trial., Acupunct Med, 26, 17, 10.1136/aim.26.1.17 · doi:10.1136/aim.26.1.17
  8. J Hesse, 1994, Acupuncture versus metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized trial of trigger point inactivation., J Intern Med, 235, 451, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01102.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01102.x

Cited by

See all 1,382

Metadata

Authors
MacPherson, H., Altman, D. G., Hammerschlag, R., Youping, L., Taixiang, W., White, A., Moher, D., & on behalf of the STRICTA Revision Group
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e1000261
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2767793280
Cited by
1,382
References
55
FWCI
51.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261
The paper
MacPherson, H., Altman, D. G., Hammerschlag, R., Youping, L., Taixiang, W., White, A., Moher, D., & on behalf of the STRICTA Revision Group. (2010). Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.