Cited by 0Hepatitis C virus researchTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatitis C care cascade among patients with and without tuberculosis: Nationwide observational cohort study in the country of Georgia, 2015–2020

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The Eastern European country of Georgia initiated a nationwide hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination program in 2015 to address a high burden of infection. Screening for HCV infection through antibody testing was integrated into multiple existing programs, including the National Tuberculosis Program (NTP). We sought to compare the hepatitis C care cascade among patients with and without tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in Georgia between 2015 and 2019 and to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU) in hepatitis C care among patients with TB. Methods and findings: Using national ID numbers, we merged databases of the HCV elimination program, NTP, and national death registry from January 1, 2015 to September 30, 2020. The study population included 11,985 adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with active TB from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019, and 1,849,820 adults tested for HCV antibodies between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2020, who were not diagnosed with TB during that time. We estimated the proportion of patients with and without TB who were LTFU at each step of the HCV care cascade and explored temporal changes. Among 11,985 patients with active TB, 9,065 (76%) patients without prior hepatitis C treatment were tested for HCV antibodies, of which 1,665 (18%) had a positive result; LTFU from hepatitis C care was common, with 316 of 1,557 (20%) patients with a positive antibody test not undergoing viremia testing and 443 of 1,025 (43%) patients with viremia not starting treatment for hepatitis C. Overall, among persons with confirmed viremic HCV infection, due to LTFU at various stages of the care cascade only 28% of patients with TB had a documented cure from HCV infection, compared to 55% among patients without TB. LTFU after positive antibody testing substantially decreased in the last 3 years, from 32% among patients diagnosed with TB in 2017 to 12% among those diagnosed in 2019. After a positive HCV antibody test, patients without TB had viremia testing sooner than patients with TB (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.39, 1.54], p < 0.001). After a positive viremia test, patients without TB started hepatitis C treatment sooner than patients with TB (HR = 2.05, 95% CI [1.87, 2.25], p < 0.001). In the risk factor analysis adjusted for age, sex, and case definition (new versus previously treated), multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB was associated with an increased risk of LTFU after a positive HCV antibody test (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 1.41, 95% CI [1.12, 1.76], p = 0.003). The main limitation of this study was that due to the reliance on existing electronic databases, we were unable to account for the impact of all confounding factors in some of the analyses. Conclusions: LTFU from hepatitis C care after a positive antibody or viremia test was high and more common among patients with TB than in those without TB. Better integration of TB and hepatitis C care systems can potentially reduce LTFU and improve patient outcomes both in Georgia and other countries that are initiating or scaling up their nationwide hepatitis C control efforts and striving to provide personalized TB treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004121

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. World Health Organization, 2021, Global Tuberculosis Report 2021. Report
  2. R Mehdiyev, 2019, HIV/tuberculosis/hepatitis C virus services for incarcerated populations in Azerbaijan and the Eastern Europe Central Asia region, Curr Opin HIV AIDS, 14, 66, 10.1097/COH.0000000000000513 · DOI
  3. FL Altice, 2016, The perfect storm: incarceration and the high-risk environment perpetuating transmission of HIV, hepatitis C virus, and tuberculosis in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Lancet, 388, 1228, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30856-X · DOI
  4. K Safreed-Harmon, 2019, The Consensus Hepatitis C Cascade of Care: Standardized Reporting to Monitor Progress Toward Elimination, Clin Infect Dis, 69, 2218, 10.1093/cid/ciz714 · DOI
  5. DB Strader, 2004, Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C, Hepatology, 39, 1147, 10.1002/hep.20119 · DOI
  6. RW Peeling, 2017, The future of viral hepatitis testing: innovations in testing technologies and approaches., BMC Infect Dis, 17, 699, 10.1186/s12879-017-2775-0 · DOI
  7. Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Persons Diagnosed with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva; 2018.
  8. S Popping, 2019, The global campaign to eliminate HBV and HCV infection: International Viral Hepatitis Elimination Meeting and core indicators for development towards the 2030 elimination goals., J Virus Erad., 5, 60, 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30281-8 · DOI
  9. Buckley GJ, Strom BL, editors. Eliminating the Public Health Problem of Hepatitis B and C in the United States: Phase One Report. Washington (DC); 2016. · DOI
  10. U. Spengler, 2018, Direct antiviral agents (DAAs)—A new age in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection., Pharmacol Ther, 183, 118, 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.10.009 · DOI
  11. HC Li, 2015, Hepatitis C virus: Virology, diagnosis and treatment, World J Hepatol, 7, 1377, 10.4254/wjh.v7.i10.1377 · DOI
  12. GJ Dore, 2015, Hepatitis C virus therapeutic development: in pursuit of “perfectovir”., Clin Infect Dis, 60, 1829, 10.1093/cid/civ197 · DOI
  13. DR Gretch, 1997, Use and interpretation of HCV diagnostic tests in the clinical setting, Clin Liver Dis, 1, 543, 10.1016/S1089-3261(05)70320-2 · DOI
  14. M Dijk, 2020, Loss to follow-up in the hepatitis C care cascade: A substantial problem but opportunity for micro-elimination, J Viral Hepat, 27, 1270, 10.1111/jvh.13399 · DOI
  15. N Lomtadze, 2013, Hepatitis C virus co-infection increases the risk of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, PLoS ONE, 8, e83892, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083892 · DOI
  16. TE Chang, 2018, The susceptibility of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury and chronic hepatitis C infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Chin Med Assoc, 81, 111, 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.10.002 · DOI
  17. RR Kempker, 2019, A Pharmacology Perspective on Simultaneous Tuberculosis and Hepatitis C Treatment, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 63, 10.1128/AAC.01215-19 · DOI
  18. World Health Organization, 2016, Roadmap to implement the tuberculosis action plan for the WHO European Region, 2016
  19. L Maistat, 2017, Hepatitis C in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: a survey of epidemiology, treatment access and civil society activity in eleven countries., Hepatol Med Policy., 2, 10.1186/s41124-017-0026-z · DOI
  20. LM Hagan, 2019, Hepatitis C prevalence and risk factors in Georgia, 2015: setting a baseline for elimination., BMC Public Health, 19, 480, 10.1186/s12889-019-6784-3 · DOI
  21. DC Richards, 2006, High prevalence of hepatitis C virus but not HIV co-infection among patients with tuberculosis in Georgia., Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 10, 396
  22. K Mitruka, 2015, Launch of a Nationwide Hepatitis C Elimination Program—Georgia, April 2015., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 64, 753, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6428a2 · DOI
  23. F Averhoff, 2019, Excellence in Viral Hepatitis Elimination—Lessons from Georgia, J Hepatol
  24. T Tsertsvadze, 2019, Three years of progress towards achieving hepatitis C elimination in the country of Georgia, April 2015—March 2018., Clin Infect Dis
  25. F Averhoff, 2019, Progress and Challenges in a Pioneering Hepatitis C Elimination Program in the Country of Georgia, 2015–2018, J Hepatol
  26. M Nasrullah, 2017, The Role of Screening and Treatment in National Progress Toward Hepatitis C Elimination—Georgia, 2015–2016., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 66, 773, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6629a2 · DOI
  27. EM Bloch, Blood transfusion safety in the country of Georgia: collateral benefit from a national hepatitis C elimination program., Transfusion. n/a
  28. K Stvilia, 2019, Progress in Testing for and Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Persons Who Inject Drugs—Georgia, 2018., MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 68, 637, 10.15585/mmwr.mm6829a2 · DOI
  29. S Shadaker, 2020, Screening and linkage to care for hepatitis C among inpatients in Georgia’s national hospital screening program., Prev Med., 138, 106153, 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106153 · DOI
  30. JJ Dignam, 2008, Choice and Interpretation of Statistical Tests Used When Competing Risks Are Present., J Clin Oncol., 26, 4027, 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9866 · DOI
  31. RJ Gray, 1988, A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk., Ann Stat, 16, 1141
  32. S Greenland, 1999, Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research., Epidemiology, 10, 37, 10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  33. KJ Lee, 2010, Multiple imputation for missing data: fully conditional specification versus multivariate normal imputation, Am J Epidemiol, 171, 624, 10.1093/aje/kwp425 · DOI
  34. F Su, 2018, The impact of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C on hepatocellular carcinoma risk., Curr Hepatol Rep, 17, 377, 10.1007/s11901-018-0424-8 · DOI
  35. LI Backus, 2018, Direct-acting antiviral sustained virologic response: Impact on mortality in patients without advanced liver disease, Hepatology, 68, 827, 10.1002/hep.29811 · DOI
  36. M Butsashvili, 2022, Barriers of linkage to HCV viremia testing among people who inject drugs in Georgia., Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy., 17, 10.1186/s13011-022-00438-6 · DOI
  37. I Chikovani, 2019, On the way to Hepatitis C elimination in the Republic of Georgia—Barriers and facilitators for people who inject drugs for engaging in the treatment program: A formative qualitative study., PLoS ONE., 14, e0216123, 10.1371/journal.pone.0216123 · DOI
  38. A Gamkrelidze, 2022, Innovative linkage model to re-engage loss-to-follow-up individuals in the national hepatitis C elimination program of Georgia, J Hepatol, 77, S216, 10.1016/S0168-8278(22)00805-4 · DOI
  39. Z Lan, 2020, Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis, Lancet Respir Med, 8, 383, 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30047-3 · DOI
  40. O Aibana, 2020, Patients’ perspectives of tuberculosis treatment challenges and barriers to treatment adherence in Ukraine: a qualitative study., BMJ Open, 10, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032027 · DOI
  41. D Skinner, 2016, It’s complicated: why do tuberculosis patients not initiate or stay adherent to treatment? A qualitative study from South Africa, BMC Infect Dis.
  42. MR O’Donnell, 2019, Antiretroviral switching and bedaquiline treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis HIV co-infection, Lancet HIV, 6, e201, 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30035-9 · DOI
  43. MR O’Donnell, 2016, Re-inventing adherence: toward a patient-centered model of care for drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV, Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 20, 430, 10.5588/ijtld.15.0360 · DOI
  44. J Furin, 2014, ’I’m fed up’: experiences of prior anti-tuberculosis treatment in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV., Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 18, 1479
  45. RH Westbrook, 2014, Natural history of hepatitis C, J Hepatol, 61, S58, 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  46. MT Yousafzai, 2021, Global cascade of care for chronic hepatitis C virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J Viral Hepat, 28, 1340, 10.1111/jvh.13574 · DOI
  47. J Strebe, 2022, Patient Navigation Increases Linkage to Care and Receipt of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Hepatitis C, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  48. N Melikyan, 2021, Concomitant Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C With Direct-Acting Antivirals and Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Is Effective and Safe., Open Forum. Infect Dis, 8, 10.1093/ofid/ofaa653 · DOI
  49. S Tunesi, 2022, Co-administration of treatment for rifampicin-resistant TB and chronic HCV infection: A TBnet and ESGMYC study., J Infect., 84, 834, 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.03.004 · DOI
  50. K Safreed-Harmon, 2018, The Micro-Elimination Approach to Eliminating Hepatitis C: Strategic and Operational Considerations, Semin Liver Dis, 38, 181, 10.1055/s-0038-1666841 · DOI
  51. M Dara, 2020, Tuberculosis, HIV, and viral hepatitis diagnostics in eastern Europe and central Asia: high time for integrated and people-centred services., Lancet Infect Dis., 20, e47, 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30524-9 · DOI
  52. AM Harris, 2019, An evaluation of the hepatitis C testing, care and treatment program in the country of Georgia’s corrections system, December 2013 –April 2015., BMC Public Health., 19, 10.1186/s12889-019-6783-4 · DOI
  53. M Butsashvili, 2020, Integration of hepatitis C treatment at harm reduction centers in Georgia-Findings from a patient satisfaction survey., Int J Drug Policy, 84, 102893, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102893 · DOI
  54. S Shilton, 2022, Feasibility and effectiveness of viraemia testing at harm reduction sites in Georgia: A prospective three-arm study, Liver Int, 42, 775, 10.1111/liv.15191 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Baliashvili, D., Blumberg, H. M., Gandhi, N. R., Averhoff, F., Benkeser, D., Shadaker, S., Gvinjilia, L., Turdziladze, A., Tukvadze, N., Chincharauli, M., Butsashvili, M., Sharvadze, L., Tsertsvadze, T., Zarkua, J., & Kempker, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • National Center for Disease Control and Public Health (GE)
  • National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (GE)
  • University of Georgia (GE)
  • AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center (GE)
Corresponding author
Baliashvili, Davit
Venue
PLOS Medicine
Published
2023-05-04
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
e1004121
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W4368617656
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW007124)
  • National Institutes of Health (K24AI114444, P30AI168386, P30AI050409, U19AI111211)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Keywords
hepatitis C, tuberculosis, cascade of care, loss to follow-up, HCV antibody screening, HCV viremia, HCV treatment initiation, HCV cure, Georgia, Eastern Europe, HIV/HCV coinfection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Georgia, Hepatitis C, Humans, Tuberculosis, Viremia, Cohort Studies, Hepacivirus, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Hepatitis C Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review