The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolbachia Infection Reduces Blood-Feeding Success in the Dengue Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The mosquito Aedes aegypti was recently transinfected with a life-shortening strain of the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis (wMelPop) as the first step in developing a biocontrol strategy for dengue virus transmission. In addition to life-shortening, the wMelPop-infected mosquitoes also exhibit increased daytime activity and metabolic rates. Here we sought to quantify the blood-feeding behaviour of Wolbachia-infected females as an indicator of any virulence or energetic drain associated with Wolbachia infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a series of blood-feeding trials in response to humans, we have shown that Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes do not differ in their response time to humans, but that as they age they obtain fewer and smaller blood meals than Wolbachia-uninfected controls. Lastly, we observed a behavioural characteristic in the Wolbachia infected mosquitoes best described as a "bendy" proboscis that may explain the decreased biting success. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together the evidence suggests that wMelPop infection may be causing tissue damage in a manner that intensifies with mosquito age and that leads to reduced blood-feeding success. These behavioural changes require further investigation with respect to a possible physiological mechanism and their role in vectorial capacity of the insect. The selective decrease of feeding success in older mosquitoes may act synergistically with other Wolbachia-associated traits including life-shortening and viral protection in biocontrol strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, M., Sun, L. V., Vamathevan, J., Riegler, M., Deboy, R., Brownlie, J. C., McGraw, E. A., Martin, W., Esser, C., Ahmadinejad, N., et al. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020069 · Cited by 851 · cited 1×
“biosynthesis [15,16].”
Self-citation
Cited by
Wolbachia and the biological control of mosquito‐borne disease
Iturbe‐Ormaetxe, I., Walker, T., & O' Neill, S. L. (2011) · EMBO reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2011.84 · Cited by 419
Self-citationBeyond insecticides: new thinking on an ancient problem
McGraw, E. A., & O'Neill, S. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2968 · Cited by 381
Self-citationBacterial symbionts in insects or the story of communities affecting communities
Ferrari, J., & Vavre, F. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0226 · Cited by 334
Wolbachia: more than just a bug in insects genitals
Saridaki, A., & Bourtzis, K. (2010) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.005 · Cited by 277
Caragata, E. P., Pais, F. S., Baton, L. A., Silva, J. B. L., Sorgine, M. H. F., & Moreira, L. A. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3441-4 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turley, A. P., Moreira, L. A., O'Neill, S. L., & McGraw, E. A.
- Venue
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e516
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2115089651
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wolbachia Infection Reduces Blood-Feeding Success in the Dengue Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000516
- The paper
- Turley, A. P., Moreira, L. A., O'Neill, S. L., & McGraw, E. A. (2009). Wolbachia Infection Reduces Blood-Feeding Success in the Dengue Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.