The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the neural substrates that underlie spontaneous musical performance, we examined improvisation in professional jazz pianists using functional MRI. By employing two paradigms that differed widely in musical complexity, we found that improvisation (compared to production of over-learned musical sequences) was consistently characterized by a dissociated pattern of activity in the prefrontal cortex: extensive deactivation of dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral orbital regions with focal activation of the medial prefrontal (frontal polar) cortex. Such a pattern may reflect a combination of psychological processes required for spontaneous improvisation, in which internally motivated, stimulus-independent behaviors unfold in the absence of central processes that typically mediate self-monitoring and conscious volitional control of ongoing performance. Changes in prefrontal activity during improvisation were accompanied by widespread activation of neocortical sensorimotor areas (that mediate the organization and execution of musical performance) as well as deactivation of limbic structures (that regulate motivation and emotional tone). This distributed neural pattern may provide a cognitive context that enables the emergence of spontaneous creative activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191355898 · Cited by 2,814
A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529 · Cited by 2,270 · cited 1×
“The DLPFC is active, for example, during effortful problem-solving, conscious self-monitoring and focused attention [33,34].”
BackgroundPersistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory
Curtis, C. E., & D'Esposito, M. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00197-9 · Cited by 2,001
KRINGELBACH, M. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006 · Cited by 1,977
Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech
Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01816-7 · Cited by 1,586
Spectral and Temporal Processing in Human Auditory Cortex
Zatorre, R. J. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.10.946 · Cited by 1,278
Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle. An H2(15)O PET study
Braun, A. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.7.1173 · Cited by 1,268
Self-citationAnterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging
Ramnani, N., & Owen, A. M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1343 · Cited by 1,170
Blood, A. J., Zatorre, R. J., Bermudez, P., & Evans, A. C. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/7299 · Cited by 1,097
Cited by
Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004 · Cited by 1,105
“Brain Network Interaction During Artistic Performance The neuroscience of artistic performance has largely centered on musical improvisation [35,38–44], although other domains have increasingly been explored, including visual art [27,45], creative writing [34,46,47], and lyrical improvisation [48].”
BackgroundA review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019749 · Cited by 907
Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008 · Cited by 611
Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses
de Witte, M., Spruit, A., van Hooren, S., Moonen, X., & Stams, G.-J. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1627897 · Cited by 539
The structure of creative cognition in the human brain
Jung, R. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00330 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-02-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1679
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101241828
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679
- The paper
- Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural Substrates of Spontaneous Musical Performance: An fMRI Study of Jazz Improvisation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
