Modulation of Brain Resting-State Networks by Sad Mood Induction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the nature of slow variations of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal observed in functional MRI resting-state studies. In humans, these slow BOLD variations are thought to reflect an underlying or intrinsic form of brain functional connectivity in discrete neuroanatomical systems. While these 'resting-state networks' may be relatively enduring phenomena, other evidence suggest that dynamic changes in their functional connectivity may also emerge depending on the brain state of subjects during scanning. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we examined healthy subjects (n = 24) with a mood induction paradigm during two continuous fMRI recordings to assess the effects of a change in self-generated mood state (neutral to sad) on the functional connectivity of these resting-state networks (n = 24). Using independent component analysis, we identified five networks that were common to both experimental states, each showing dominant signal fluctuations in the very low frequency domain (approximately 0.04 Hz). Between the two states, we observed apparent increases and decreases in the overall functional connectivity of these networks. Primary findings included increased connectivity strength of a paralimbic network involving the dorsal anterior cingulate and anterior insula cortices with subjects' increasing sadness and decreased functional connectivity of the 'default mode network'. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support recent studies that suggest the functional connectivity of certain resting-state networks may, in part, reflect a dynamic image of the current brain state. In our study, this was linked to changes in subjective mood.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Harrison et al., 2008 used a continuous sad mood induction paradigm compared to resting state, and Calhoun et al., 2008 used ICASSO to insure ICA stability.
“In our case, however, similar to Harrison et al., 2008, who used a continuous sad mood induction paradigm compared to RS, we decided to decompose independent components for both conditions separately, also following the method of Calhoun et al., 2008, who used ICASSO to insure ICA stability.”
From State and training effects of mindfulness meditation on brain networks reflect neuronal mechanisms of its antidepressant effect (2016) · cites this paper as Harrison et al., 2008
The Results (Functional MRI) and Materials and Methods (Group ICA) say Harrison et al. analyzed the neutral and sad recall runs separately with group ICA. The Introduction describes two continuous, resting-like acquisitions, but the comparison was sad recall versus active neutral autobiographical recall, not a separate resting-state condition. The Calhoun/ICASSO clause is attributed to another source and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth DMN independent components were derived from the same very low frequency band (<0.04 Hz), ensuring that the comparison between rest and meditation states was performed in the same expected very low frequency domain.
“The results revealed that both DMNs were derived from the same very low frequency band (<0.04 Hz). This insured that the comparison between RS and MS were performed in the same “expected” very low frequency domain [60]; see Figure 4.”
From State and training effects of mindfulness meditation on brain networks reflect neuronal mechanisms of its antidepressant effect (2016) · cites this paper as [60]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 73 · Cited by 206
- Authors
- Harrison, B. J., Pujol, J., Ortiz, H., Fornito, A., Pantelis, C., & Yücel, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Harrison, Ben J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-03-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1794
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2263138
- OpenAlex
- W2057012829
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ramaciotti Foundations
- David and Elaine Potter Foundation
- Ian Potter Foundation
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (350241, 400420, 236175, I.D. 350241)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- resting-state networks, mood induction, sadness, functional connectivity, default mode network, anterior insula, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, brain states, dynamic functional connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review