The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reverse and Conventional Chemical Ecology Approaches for the Development of Oviposition Attractants for Culex Mosquitoes
Open accessAbstract
Synthetic mosquito oviposition attractants are sorely needed for surveillance and control programs for Culex species, which are major vectors of pathogens causing various human diseases, including filariasis, encephalitis, and West Nile encephalomyelitis. We employed novel and conventional chemical ecology approaches to identify potential attractants, which were demonstrated in field tests to be effective for monitoring populations of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus in human dwellings. Immunohistochemistry studies showed that an odorant-binding protein from this species, CquiOBP1, is expressed in trichoid sensilla on the antennae, including short, sharp-tipped trichoid sensilla type, which house an olfactory receptor neuron sensitive to a previously identified mosquito oviposition pheromone (MOP), 6-acetoxy-5-hexadecanolide. CquiOBP1 exists in monomeric and dimeric forms. Monomeric CquiOBP1 bound MOP in a pH-dependent manner, with a change in secondary structure apparently related to the loss of binding at low pH. The pheromone antipode showed higher affinity than the natural stereoisomer. By using both CquiOBP1 as a molecular target in binding assays and gas chromatography-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD), we identified nonanal, trimethylamine (TMA), and skatole as test compounds. Extensive field evaluations in Recife, Brazil, a region with high populations of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus, showed that a combination of TMA (0.9 microg/l) and nonanal (0.15 ng/microl) is equivalent in attraction to the currently used infusion-based lure, and superior in that the offensive smell of infusions was eliminated in the newly developed synthetic mixture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olagbemiro, T. O., Birkett, M. A., (Luntz), A. J. M., & Pickett, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1023/b:joec.0000028461.86243.19 · Cited by 53
Mboera, L. E. G., Takken, W., Mdira, K. Y., Chuwa, G. J., & Pickett, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1005432010721 · Cited by 36
Cited by
Sex Pheromones and Their Impact on Pest Management
Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P., & Cork, A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y · Cited by 1,050
Acute olfactory response of Culex mosquitoes to a human- and bird-derived attractant
Syed, Z., & Leal, W. S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906932106 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leal, W. S., Barbosa, R. M. R., Xu, W., Ishida, Y., Syed, Z., Latte, N., Chen, A. M., Morgan, T. I., Cornel, A. J., & Furtado, A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-08-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e3045
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144778725
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reverse and Conventional Chemical Ecology Approaches for the Development of Oviposition Attractants for Culex Mosquitoes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0003045
- The paper
- Leal, W. S., Barbosa, R. M. R., Xu, W., Ishida, Y., Syed, Z., Latte, N., Chen, A. M., Morgan, T. I., Cornel, A. J., & Furtado, A. (2008). Reverse and Conventional Chemical Ecology Approaches for the Development of Oviposition Attractants for Culex Mosquitoes. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.