The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The prediction of the genetic disease risk of an individual is a powerful public health tool. While predicting risk has been successful in diseases which follow simple Mendelian inheritance, it has proven challenging in complex diseases for which a large number of loci contribute to the genetic variance. The large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms now available provide new opportunities for predicting genetic risk of complex diseases with high accuracy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have derived simple deterministic formulae to predict the accuracy of predicted genetic risk from population or case control studies using a genome-wide approach and assuming a dichotomous disease phenotype with an underlying continuous liability. We show that the prediction equations are special cases of the more general problem of predicting the accuracy of estimates of genetic values of a continuous phenotype. Our predictive equations are responsive to all parameters that affect accuracy and they are independent of allele frequency and effect distributions. Deterministic prediction errors when tested by simulation were generally small. The common link among the expressions for accuracy is that they are best summarized as the product of the ratio of number of phenotypic records per number of risk loci and the observed heritability. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study advances the understanding of the relative power of case control and population studies of disease. The predictions represent an upper bound of accuracy which may be achievable with improved effect estimation methods. The formulae derived will help researchers determine an appropriate sample size to attain a certain accuracy when predicting genetic risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Are Rare Variants Responsible for Susceptibility to Complex Diseases?
Pritchard, J. K. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/321272 · Cited by 1,197
Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide Scans
Göring, H. H. H., Terwilliger, J. D., & Blangero, J. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/324471 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Power and predictive accuracy of polygenic risk scores
Dudbridge, F. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003348 · Cited by 1,509
“tively taken that var(b̂i1{bi1)&n {1 1 as previously suggested by Daetwyler et al [23].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores
Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Yang, J., Finucane, H. K., Gusev, A., Lindström, S., Ripke, S., Genovese, G., Loh, P.-R., Bhatia, G., Do, R., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.001 · Cited by 1,303
Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG
23andMe Research Team, Turley, P., Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Walters, R. K., Maghzian, O., Okbay, A., Lee, J. J., Fontana, M. A., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., Wedow, R., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4 · Cited by 1,112
“As in the calculation of the GWAS-equivalent sample size, where we assume that M e is the same in every GWAS sample and in the prediction sample, the expected predictive power of a polygenic score is where h 2 is the SNP heritability of the trait 28–30 .”
Estimating Missing Heritability for Disease from Genome-wide Association Studies
Lee, S. H., Wray, N. R., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.002 · Cited by 1,064
23and Me Research Team, Karlsson Linnér, R., eQTLgen Consortium, International Cannabis Consortium, Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Biroli, P., Kong, E., Meddens, S. F. W., Wedow, R., Fontana, M. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0309-3 · Cited by 756
Metadata
- Authors
- Daetwyler, H. D., Villanueva, B., & Woolliams, J. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-10-14
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e3395
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123523713
- Cited by
- 718
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
- The paper
- Daetwyler, H. D., Villanueva, B., & Woolliams, J. A. (2008). Accuracy of Predicting the Genetic Risk of Disease Using a Genome-Wide Approach. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.