The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Biostatistical Analysis of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer Using a Large Population-Based Sample
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is a distinct phenotype associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutation in colon cancer. Recent investigations have selected 5 promoters (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1) as surrogate markers for CIMP-high. However, no study has comprehensively evaluated an expanded set of methylation markers (including these 5 markers) using a large number of tumors, or deciphered the complex clinical and molecular associations with CIMP-high determined by the validated marker panel. METHOLODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: DNA methylation at 16 CpG islands [the above 5 plus CDKN2A (p16), CHFR, CRABP1, HIC1, IGFBP3, MGMT, MINT1, MINT31, MLH1, p14 (CDKN2A/ARF) and WRN] was quantified in 904 colorectal cancers by real-time PCR (MethyLight). In unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis, the 5 markers (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1), CDKN2A, CRABP1, MINT31, MLH1, p14 and WRN were generally clustered with each other and with MSI and BRAF mutation. KRAS mutation was not clustered with any methylation marker, suggesting its association with a random methylation pattern in CIMP-low tumors. Utilizing the validated CIMP marker panel (including the 5 markers), multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that CIMP-high was independently associated with older age, proximal location, poor differentiation, MSI-high, BRAF mutation, and inversely with LINE-1 hypomethylation and beta-catenin (CTNNB1) activation. Mucinous feature, signet ring cells, and p53-negativity were associated with CIMP-high in only univariate analysis. In stratified analyses, the relations of CIMP-high with poor differentiation, KRAS mutation and LINE-1 hypomethylation significantly differed according to MSI status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides valuable data for standardization of the use of CIMP-high-specific methylation markers. CIMP-high is independently associated with clinical and key molecular features in colorectal cancer. Our data also suggest that KRAS mutation is related with a random CpG island methylation pattern which may lead to CIMP-low tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nurses׳ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women
Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2005) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1608 · Cited by 590
The SIRT1 deacetylase suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis and colon cancer growth.
Firestein, R., Blander, G., Michan, S., Oberdoerffer, P., Ogino, S., Campbell, J., Bhimavarapu, A., Luikenhuis, S., de Cabo, R., Fuchs, C., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002020 · Cited by 588
Self-citation
Cited by
Molecular Basis of Colorectal Cancer
Markowitz, S. D., & Bertagnolli, M. M. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0804588 · Cited by 2,052
Fusobacterium nucleatum and T Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma
Mima, K., Sukawa, Y., Nishihara, R., Qian, Z. R., Yamauchi, M., Inamura, K., Kim, S. A., Masuda, A., Nowak, J. A., Nosho, K., et al. (2015) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1377 · Cited by 669
Self-citationGenetic Mechanisms of Immune Evasion in Colorectal Cancer
Grasso, C. S., Giannakis, M., Wells, D. K., Hamada, T., Mu, X. J., Quist, M., Nowak, J. A., Nishihara, R., Qian, Z. R., Inamura, K., et al. (2018) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1327 · Cited by 535
“CIMP-high was defined as methylation in ≥ 6 of eight promoters (97).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBaldus, S. E., Schaefer, K.-L., Engers, R., Hartleb, D., Stoecklein, N. H., & Gabbert, H. E. (2010) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-2446 · Cited by 432
Prognostic Role of PIK3CA Mutation in Colorectal Cancer: Cohort Study and Literature Review
Liao, X., Morikawa, T., Lochhead, P., Imamura, Y., Kuchiba, A., Yamauchi, M., Nosho, K., Qian, Z. R., Nishihara, R., Meyerhardt, J. A., et al. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2410 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nosho, K., Irahara, N., Shima, K., Kure, S., Kirkner, G. J., Schernhammer, E. S., Hazra, A., Hunter, D. J., Quackenbush, J., Spiegelman, D., Giovannucci, E. L., Fuchs, C. S., & Ogino, S.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-11-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e3698
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987745928
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Biostatistical Analysis of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer Using a Large Population-Based Sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0003698
- The paper
- Nosho, K., Irahara, N., Shima, K., Kure, S., Kirkner, G. J., Schernhammer, E. S., Hazra, A., Hunter, D. J., Quackenbush, J., Spiegelman, D., Giovannucci, E. L., Fuchs, C. S., & Ogino, S. (2008). Comprehensive Biostatistical Analysis of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer Using a Large Population-Based Sample. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.