Wild Chimpanzees Exchange Meat for Sex on a Long-Term Basis
Open accessAbstract
Humans and chimpanzees are unusual among primates in that they frequently perform group hunts of mammalian prey and share meat with conspecifics. Especially interesting are cases in which males give meat to unrelated females. The meat-for-sex hypothesis aims at explaining these cases by proposing that males and females exchange meat for sex, which would result in males increasing their mating success and females increasing their caloric intake without suffering the energetic costs and potential risk of injury related to hunting. Although chimpanzees have been shown to share meat extensively with females, there has not been much direct evidence in this species to support the meat-for-sex hypothesis. Here we show that female wild chimpanzees copulate more frequently with those males who, over a period of 22 months, share meat with them. We excluded other alternative hypotheses to exchanging meat for sex, by statistically controlling for rank of the male, age, rank and gregariousness of the female, association patterns of each male-female dyad and meat begging frequency of each female. Although males were more likely to share meat with estrous than anestrous females given their proportional representation in hunting parties, the relationship between mating success and sharing meat remained significant after excluding from the analysis sharing episodes with estrous females. These results strongly suggest that wild chimpanzees exchange meat for sex, and do so on a long-term basis. Similar studies on humans will determine if the direct nutritional benefits that women receive from hunters in foraging societies could also be driving the relationship between reproductive success and good hunting skills.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Links between food sharing and long-term benefits have been described on a behavioural level for chimpanzees reciprocally sharing meat, exchanging meat for sex, or exchanging meat for agonistic support.
“Such links between food sharing and long-term benefits have been described on a behavioural level for chimpanzees reciprocally sharing meat [7,78], and exchanging meat for sex [50] or agonistic support [54].”
From Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees (2014) · cites this paper as [50]
Food sharing in chimpanzees occurs between kin, in sexual contexts, and also between non-kin adults in non-sexual contexts, which is unusual in the animal kingdom.
“What makes food sharing in chimpanzees unusual in the animal kingdom is that, as well as occurring between kin [52] and in sexual contexts [50], food sharing also occurs between non-kin adults in non-sexual contexts [13,15,52,53].”
From Food sharing is linked to urinary oxytocin levels and bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees (2014) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 249
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [9]Boesch C Boesch-Acherman H 2000 The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest Oxford Oxford University Press
- [13]Boesch C Boesch H Vigilant L 2006 Cooperative hunting in chimpanzees: Kinship or mutualism? Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and evolution Berlin Springer 139 150
- [24]Baayen RH 2008 Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics Cambridge Cambridge University Press
- [27]Muller MN Kahlenberg SM Emery Thompson M Wrangham RW 2007 Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B 274 1009 1014 PMC2141672 17264062
- Authors
- Gomes, C. M., & Boesch, C.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gomes, Cristina M.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-04-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e5116
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2663035
- OpenAlex
- W2162038983
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 24.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wenner-Gren Foundation
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- chimpanzees, meat sharing, copulation frequency, mating success, female reproductive success, group hunting, estrous cycle, social rank, primate social behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Pan troglodytes, Female, Food, Male, Meat, Sexual Behavior, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review