Cited by 237Wound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Community Analysis of Chronic Wound Bacteria Using 16S rRNA Gene-Based Pyrosequencing: Impact of Diabetes and Antibiotics on Chronic Wound Microbiota

Open access
Price, Lance B., Liu, Cindy M., Melendez, Johan H., Frankel, Yelena M., Engelthaler, David, Aziz, Maliha, Bowers, Jolene, Rattray, Rogan +5 more·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial colonization is hypothesized to play a pathogenic role in the non-healing state of chronic wounds. We characterized wound bacteria from a cohort of chronic wound patients using a 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing approach and assessed the impact of diabetes and antibiotics on chronic wound microbiota. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We prospectively enrolled 24 patients at a referral wound center in Baltimore, MD; sampled patients' wounds by curette; cultured samples under aerobic and anaerobic conditions; and pyrosequenced the 16S rRNA V3 hypervariable region. The 16S rRNA gene-based analyses revealed an average of 10 different bacterial families in wounds--approximately 4 times more than estimated by culture-based analyses. Fastidious anaerobic bacteria belonging to the Clostridiales family XI were among the most prevalent bacteria identified exclusively by 16S rRNA gene-based analyses. Community-scale analyses showed that wound microbiota from antibiotic treated patients were significantly different from untreated patients (p = 0.007) and were characterized by increased Pseudomonadaceae abundance. These analyses also revealed that antibiotic use was associated with decreased Streptococcaceae among diabetics and that Streptococcaceae was more abundant among diabetics as compared to non-diabetics. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The 16S rRNA gene-based analyses revealed complex bacterial communities including anaerobic bacteria that may play causative roles in the non-healing state of some chronic wounds. Our data suggest that antimicrobial therapy alters community structure--reducing some bacteria while selecting for others.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0006462

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 237

Authors
Price, L. B., Liu, C. M., Melendez, J. H., Frankel, Y. M., Engelthaler, D., Aziz, M., Bowers, J., Rattray, R., Ravel, J., Kingsley, C., Keim, P. S., Lazarus, G. S., & Zenilman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Price, Lance B.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-07-31
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
e6462
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967513858
Cited by
237
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH)
  • U.S. Army (W81XWH)
  • Center for Innovative Medicine
  • Medical Research and Materiel Command
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
chronic wounds, wound microbiota, bacterial colonization, diabetes mellitus, antibiotic use, anaerobic bacteria, Pseudomonadaceae, Streptococcaceae, 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing, antimicrobial therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Wounds and Injuries, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review