Cited by 259Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Multi-Determinants Analysis of Molecular Alterations for Predicting Clinical Benefit to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea, Di Nicolantonio, Federica, Nichelatti, Michele, Molinari, Francesca, De Dosso, Sara, Saletti, Piercarlo, Martini, Miriam, Cipani, Tiziana +7 more·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations occur in 35-45% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) and preclude responsiveness to EGFR-targeted therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab. However, less than 20% patients displaying wild-type KRAS tumors achieve objective response. Alterations in other effectors downstream of the EGFR, such as BRAF, and deregulation of the PIK3CA/PTEN pathway have independently been found to give rise to resistance. We present a comprehensive analysis of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN expression in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab, with the aim of clarifying the relative contribution of these molecular alterations to resistance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We retrospectively analyzed objective tumor response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) together with the mutational status of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and expression of PTEN in 132 tumors from cetuximab or panitumumab treated mCRC patients. Among the 106 non-responsive patients, 74 (70%) had tumors with at least one molecular alteration in the four markers. The probability of response was 51% (22/43) among patients with no alterations, 4% (2/47) among patients with 1 alteration, and 0% (0/24) for patients with > or =2 alterations (p<0.0001). Accordingly, PFS and OS were increasingly worse for patients with tumors harboring none, 1, or > or =2 molecular alteration(s) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: When expression of PTEN and mutations of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA are concomitantly ascertained, up to 70% of mCRC patients unlikely to respond to anti-EGFR therapies can be identified. We propose to define as 'quadruple negative', the CRCs lacking alterations in KRAS, BRAF, PTEN and PIK3CA. Comprehensive molecular dissection of the EGFR signaling pathways should be considered to select mCRC patients for cetuximab- or panitumumab-based therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0007287

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 259

Authors
Sartore-Bianchi, A., Di Nicolantonio, F., Nichelatti, M., Molinari, F., De Dosso, S., Saletti, P., Martini, M., Cipani, T., Marrapese, G., Mazzucchelli, L., Lamba, S., Veronese, S., Frattini, M., Bardelli, A., & Siena, S.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • Istituto Cantonale di Patologia (CH)
  • Ospedale San Giovanni Bellinzona (CH)
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • IFOM (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Bardelli, Alberto
  • Siena, Salvatore
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-10-02
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
e7287
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038386885
Cited by
259
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 24
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Oncosuisse
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • Regione Piemonte
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, anti-EGFR therapy, cetuximab, panitumumab, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation, PTEN expression, treatment resistance, predictive biomarkers, EGFR signaling, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Genes, ras, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review