Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 755

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene Expression-Based Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas and Survival Prediction

Open access
Hou, Jun, Aerts, Joachim, den Hamer, Bianca, van IJcken, Wilfred, den Bakker, Michael, Riegman, Peter, van der Leest, Cor, van der Spek, Peter, Foekens, John A., Hoogsteden, Henk C., Grosveld, Frank, Philipsen, Sjaak·2010·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current clinical therapy of non-small cell lung cancer depends on histo-pathological classification. This approach poorly predicts clinical outcome for individual patients. Gene expression profiling holds promise to improve clinical stratification, thus paving the way for individualized therapy. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A genome-wide gene expression analysis was performed on a cohort of 91 patients. We used 91 tumor- and 65 adjacent normal lung tissue samples. We defined sets of predictor genes (probe sets) with the expression profiles. The power of predictor genes was evaluated using an independent cohort of 96 non-small cell lung cancer- and 6 normal lung samples. We identified a tumor signature of 5 genes that aggregates the 156 tumor and normal samples into the expected groups. We also identified a histology signature of 75 genes, which classifies the samples in the major histological subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer. Correlation analysis identified 17 genes which showed the best association with post-surgery survival time. This signature was used for stratification of all patients in two risk groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show that the two groups display a significant difference in post-surgery survival time (p = 5.6E-6). The performance of the signatures was validated using a patient cohort of similar size (Duke University, n = 96). Compared to previously published prognostic signatures for NSCLC, the 17 gene signature performed well on these two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The gene signatures identified are promising tools for histo-pathological classification of non-small cell lung cancer, and may improve the prediction of clinical outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0010312

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 755

Metadata

Authors
Hou, J., Aerts, J., den Hamer, B., van IJcken, W., den Bakker, M., Riegman, P., van der Leest, C., van der Spek, P., Foekens, J. A., Hoogsteden, H. C., Grosveld, F., & Philipsen, S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-04-22
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
e10312
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044545697
Cited by
755
References
3
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene Expression-Based Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas and Survival Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0010312
The paper
Hou, J., Aerts, J., den Hamer, B., van IJcken, W., den Bakker, M., Riegman, P., van der Leest, C., van der Spek, P., Foekens, J. A., Hoogsteden, H. C., Grosveld, F., & Philipsen, S. (2010). Gene Expression-Based Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas and Survival Prediction. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010312

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.