The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating and Modelling Bias of the Hierarchical Partitioning Public-Domain Software: Implications in Environmental Management and Conservation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hierarchical partitioning (HP) is an analytical method of multiple regression that identifies the most likely causal factors while alleviating multicollinearity problems. Its use is increasing in ecology and conservation by its usefulness for complementing multiple regression analysis. A public-domain software "hier.part package" has been developed for running HP in R software. Its authors highlight a "minor rounding error" for hierarchies constructed from >9 variables, however potential bias by using this module has not yet been examined. Knowing this bias is pivotal because, for example, the ranking obtained in HP is being used as a criterion for establishing priorities of conservation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using numerical simulations and two real examples, we assessed the robustness of this HP module in relation to the order the variables have in the analysis. Results indicated a considerable effect of the variable order on the amount of independent variance explained by predictors for models with >9 explanatory variables. For these models the nominal ranking of importance of the predictors changed with variable order, i.e. predictors declared important by its contribution in explaining the response variable frequently changed to be either most or less important with other variable orders. The probability of changing position of a variable was best explained by the difference in independent explanatory power between that variable and the previous one in the nominal ranking of importance. The lesser is this difference, the more likely is the change of position. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: HP should be applied with caution when more than 9 explanatory variables are used to know ranking of covariate importance. The explained variance is not a useful parameter to use in models with more than 9 independent variables. The inconsistency in the results obtained by HP should be considered in future studies as well as in those already published. Some recommendations to improve the analysis with this HP module are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Olea et al. (150) have shown that for more than nine explanatory variables, the order in which variables are entered in an HP analysis can affect the amount of independent variance explained by a given predictor.”
From Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web (2018) · cites this paper as [150]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,829
Brown, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532174 · Cited by 8,263
Koyak, R. A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290538 · Cited by 7,717
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470515075 · Cited by 6,980
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,431
Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03141 · Cited by 3,156
CONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSION
Graham, M. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-3114 · Cited by 2,583
Chevan, A., & Sutherland, M. (1991) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1991.10475776 · Cited by 1,181
Mac Nally, R. (2000) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1008985925162 · Cited by 938
Is conservation triage just smart decision making?
Bottrill, M. C., Joseph, L. N., Carwardine, J., Bode, M., Cook, C. N., Game, E. T., Grantham, H. S., Kark, S., Linke, S., McDonald‐Madden, E., et al. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007 · Cited by 642
Fish Invasions in the World's River Systems: When Natural Processes Are Blurred by Human Activities
Leprieur, F., Beauchard, O., Blanchet, S., Oberdorff, T., & Brosse, S. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060028 · Cited by 594
Prioritizing global conservation efforts
Wilson, K. A., McBride, M. F., Bode, M., & Possingham, H. P. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04366 · Cited by 589
Mac Nally, R. (2002) · Biodiversity & Conservation · doi:10.1023/a:1016250716679 · Cited by 554
Hierarchical Partitioning Public-domain Software
Nally, R. M., & Walsh, C. J. (2003) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000009515.11717.0b · Cited by 406
Optimal Conservation of Migratory Species
Martin, T. G., Chadès, I., Arcese, P., Marra, P. P., Possingham, H. P., & Norris, D. R. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000751 · Cited by 375
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., & Rainio, K. (2004) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00938.x · Cited by 354
McAlpine, C., Rhodes, J. R., Callaghan, J. G., Bowen, M. E., Lunney, D., Mitchell, D. L., Pullar, D. V., & Possingham, H. P. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.021 · Cited by 208
New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., & Pöyry, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3212 · Cited by 207
Buse, J., Schröder, B., & Aßmann, T. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.025 · Cited by 189
Regression Techniques for Examining Land Use/Cover Change: A Case Study of a Mediterranean Landscape
Millington, J. D. A., Perry, G. L. W., & Calcerrada, R. R. (2007) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9020-4 · Cited by 150
Carrete, M., Grande, J. M., Tella, J. L., Sánchez‐Zapata, J. A., Donázar, J. A., Dı́az-Delgado, R., & Romo, A. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.025 · Cited by 147
Leprieur, F., Beauchard, O., Blanchet, S., Oberdorff, T., & Brosse, S. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060322 · Cited by 145
Determinants of the biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions
Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K., Pöyry, J., & Saarinen, K. (2006) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01395.x · Cited by 133
Walsh, C. J., Papas, P., Crowther, D., Sim, P. T., & Yoo, J. (2004) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000011726.38121.b0 · Cited by 76
de Frutos, Á., Olea, P. P., & Vera, R. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.007 · Cited by 73
Self-citationGibson, L. A., Wilson, B. A., & Aberton, J. G. (2004) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.027 · Cited by 51
Müller, J. C., Pöllath, J., Moshammer, R., & Schröder, B. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.023 · Cited by 45
Marini, L., Prosser, F., Klimek, S., & Marrs, R. H. (2008) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01924.x · Cited by 38
Combining scales in habitat models to improve conservation planning in an endangered vulture
Mateo‐Tomás, P., & Olea, P. P. (2009) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2009.03.004 · Cited by 37
Self-citationSTATUS OF THE LESSER KESTREL IN SOUTH AFRICA
Siegfried, W. R., & Skead, D. M. (1971) · Ostrich · doi:10.1080/00306525.1971.9634388 · Cited by 19
Olea, P. P. (2008) · Population Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10144-008-0106-4 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web
Lister, B. C., & Garcia, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722477115 · Cited by 730
Effects of stand age, richness and density on productivity in subtropical forests in China
Ouyang, S., Xiang, W., Wang, X., Xiao, W., Chen, L., Li, S., Sun, H., Deng, X., Forrester, D. I., Zeng, L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13194 · Cited by 216
Davy, A. J., Brown, M. J., Mossman, H. L., & Grant, A. (2011) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01870.x · Cited by 187
Renard, Q., Pélissier, R., Ramesh, B. R., & Kodandapani, N. (2012) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf10109 · Cited by 136
Linking life history traits to pollinator loss in fragmented calcareous grasslands
Jauker, B., Krauß, J., Jauker, F., & Steffan-Dewenter, I. D. (2012) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9820-6 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Olea, P. P., Mateo-Tomás, P., & de Frutos, Á.
- Affiliations
- IE University (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Olea, Pedro P.
- ORCID
- Olea, Pedro P.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e11698
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2908144
- OpenAlex
- W2089525213
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Data Analysis with R
- Keywords
- hierarchical partitioning, multicollinearity, explained variance, conservation prioritization, environmental management, ecological inference, numerical simulation
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Models, Theoretical, Software, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
