The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuromuscular Consequences of an Extreme Mountain Ultra-Marathon
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the physiological consequences of one of the most extreme exercises realized by humans in race conditions: a 166-km mountain ultra-marathon (MUM) with 9500 m of positive and negative elevation change. For this purpose, (i) the fatigue induced by the MUM and (ii) the recovery processes over two weeks were assessed. Evaluation of neuromuscular function (NMF) and blood markers of muscle damage and inflammation were performed before and immediately following (n = 22), and 2, 5, 9 and 16 days after the MUM (n = 11) in experienced ultra-marathon runners. Large maximal voluntary contraction decreases occurred after MUM (-35% [95% CI: -28 to -42%] and -39% [95% CI: -32 to -46%] for KE and PF, respectively), with alteration of maximal voluntary activation, mainly for KE (-19% [95% CI: -7 to -32%]). Significant modifications in markers of muscle damage and inflammation were observed after the MUM as suggested by the large changes in creatine kinase (from 144 ± 94 to 13,633 ± 12,626 UI L(-1)), myoglobin (from 32 ± 22 to 1,432 ± 1,209 µg L(-1)), and C-Reactive Protein (from <2.0 to 37.7 ± 26.5 mg L(-1)). Moderate to large reductions in maximal compound muscle action potential amplitude, high-frequency doublet force, and low frequency fatigue (index of excitation-contraction coupling alteration) were also observed for both muscle groups. Sixteen days after MUM, NMF had returned to initial values, with most of the recovery process occurring within 9 days of the race. These findings suggest that the large alterations in NMF after an ultra-marathon race are multi-factorial, including failure of excitation-contraction coupling, which has never been described after prolonged running. It is also concluded that as early as two weeks after such an extreme running exercise, maximal force capacities have returned to baseline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Muscle stiffness, strength loss, swelling and soreness following exercise-induced injury in humans
Howell, J. N., Chleboun, G., & Conatser, R. (1993) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019629 · Cited by 337
Cited by
Antioxidant Supplementation during Exercise Training: Beneficial or Detrimental?
Peternelj, T.-T., & Coombes, J. S. (2011) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11594400-000000000-00000 · Cited by 314
Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running
Vernillo, G., Giandolini, M., Edwards, W. B., Morin, J.-B., Samozino, P., Horvais, N., & Millet, G. Y. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0605-y · Cited by 289
Self-citationFroyd, C., Millet, G. Y., & Noakes, T. D. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245316 · Cited by 176
Self-citationExtrapolating Metabolic Savings in Running: Implications for Performance Predictions
Kipp, S., Kram, R., & Hoogkamer, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00079 · Cited by 129
Hurdiel, R., Pezé, T., Daugherty, J., Girard, J., Poussel, M., Poletti, L., Basset, P., & Theunynck, D. (2015) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.960883 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Millet, G. Y., Tomazin, K., Verges, S., Vincent, C., Bonnefoy, R., Boisson, R.-C., Gergelé, L., Féasson, L., & Martin, V.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-02-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e17059
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070561881
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.