Cited by 80Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Staphylococcus aureus keratinocyte invasion is dependent upon multiple high-affinity fibronectin-binding repeats within FnBPA

Open access
Edwards, Andrew M., Potter, Ursula, Meenan, Nicola A. G., Potts, Jennifer R., Massey, Ruth C.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal organism and a frequent cause of skin and soft tissue infections, which can progress to serious invasive disease. This bacterium uses its fibronectin binding proteins (FnBPs) to invade host cells and it has been hypothesised that this provides a protected niche from host antimicrobial defences, allows access to deeper tissues and provides a reservoir for persistent or recurring infections. FnBPs contain multiple tandem fibronectin-binding repeats (FnBRs) which bind fibronectin with varying affinity but it is unclear what selects for this configuration. Since both colonisation and skin infection are dependent upon the interaction of S. aureus with keratinocytes we hypothesised that this might select for FnBP function and thus composition of the FnBR region. Initial experiments revealed that S. aureus attachment to keratinocytes is rapid but does not require FnBRs. By contrast, invasion of keratinocytes was dependent upon the FnBR region and occurred via similar cellular processes to those described for endothelial cells. Despite this, keratinocyte invasion was relatively inefficient and appeared to include a lag phase, most likely due to very weak expression of α(5)β(1) integrins. Molecular dissection of the role of the FnBR region revealed that efficient invasion of keratinocytes was dependent on the presence of at least three high-affinity (but not low-affinity) FnBRs. Over-expression of a single high-affinity or three low-affinity repeats promoted invasion but not to the same levels as S. aureus expressing an FnBPA variant containing three high-affinity repeats. In summary, invasion of keratinocytes by S. aureus requires multiple high-affinity FnBRs within FnBPA, and given the importance of the interaction between these cell types and S. aureus for both colonisation and infection, may have provided the selective pressure for the multiple binding repeats within FnBPA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0018899

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 80

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Sambrook J Fritsch EF Maniatis T 1989 Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn Cold Spring Harbor, New York Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press

Authors
Edwards, A. M., Potter, U., Meenan, N. A. G., Potts, J. R., & Massey, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Andrew M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-04-22
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
e18899
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003076046
Cited by
80
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • Wellcome Trust (WT 079588, 079588)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • University of Bristol
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Wageningen University and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, fibronectin-binding protein A, fibronectin-binding protein, bacterial invasion, high-affinity binding, low-affinity binding, alpha5beta1 integrin, bacterial adhesion, skin and soft tissue infections, bacterial colonization, host-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Cell Line, Cell Membrane, Cell Movement, Humans, Peptides, Protein Binding, Recombinant Proteins, Staphylococcus aureus, Time Factors, Keratinocytes, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Adhesins, Bacterial, Repetitive Sequences, Amino Acid, Integrin alpha5beta1, Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review