The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a Characterization of Behavior-Disease Models
Open accessAbstract
The last decade saw the advent of increasingly realistic epidemic models that leverage on the availability of highly detailed census and human mobility data. Data-driven models aim at a granularity down to the level of households or single individuals. However, relatively little systematic work has been done to provide coupled behavior-disease models able to close the feedback loop between behavioral changes triggered in the population by an individual's perception of the disease spread and the actual disease spread itself. While models lacking this coupling can be extremely successful in mild epidemics, they obviously will be of limited use in situations where social disruption or behavioral alterations are induced in the population by knowledge of the disease. Here we propose a characterization of a set of prototypical mechanisms for self-initiated social distancing induced by local and non-local prevalence-based information available to individuals in the population. We characterize the effects of these mechanisms in the framework of a compartmental scheme that enlarges the basic SIR model by considering separate behavioral classes within the population. The transition of individuals in/out of behavioral classes is coupled with the spreading of the disease and provides a rich phase space with multiple epidemic peaks and tipping points. The class of models presented here can be used in the case of data-driven computational approaches to analyze scenarios of social adaptation and behavioral change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Hatchett, R. J., Mecher, C. E., & Lipsitch, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610941104 · Cited by 778
Cited by
Epidemic processes in complex networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P., & Vespignani, A. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925 · Cited by 3,697
Self-citationStatistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Self-citationBehavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015)
Verelst, F., Willem, L., & Beutels, P. (2016) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0820 · Cited by 382
A model and predictions for COVID-19 considering population behavior and vaccination
Usherwood, T., LaJoie, Z., & Srivastava, V. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91514-7 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Perra, N., Balcan, D., Gonçalves, B., & Vespignani, A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-08-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e23084
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162452562
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a Characterization of Behavior-Disease Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0023084
- The paper
- Perra, N., Balcan, D., Gonçalves, B., & Vespignani, A. (2011). Towards a Characterization of Behavior-Disease Models. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.