The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacteriophage-Resistant Mutants in Yersinia pestis: Identification of Phage Receptors and Attenuation for Mice
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Bacteriophages specific for Yersinia pestis are routinely used for plague diagnostics and could be an alternative to antibiotics in case of drug-resistant plague. A major concern of bacteriophage therapy is the emergence of phage-resistant mutants. The use of phage cocktails can overcome this problem but only if the phages exploit different receptors. Some phage-resistant mutants lose virulence and therefore should not complicate bacteriophage therapy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The purpose of this work was to identify Y. pestis phage receptors using site-directed mutagenesis and trans-complementation and to determine potential attenuation of phage-resistant mutants for mice. Six receptors for eight phages were found in different parts of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inner and outer core. The receptor for R phage was localized beyond the LPS core. Most spontaneous and defined phage-resistant mutants of Y. pestis were attenuated, showing increase in LD₅₀ and time to death. The loss of different LPS core biosynthesis enzymes resulted in the reduction of Y. pestis virulence and there was a correlation between the degree of core truncation and the impact on virulence. The yrbH and waaA mutants completely lost their virulence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We identified Y. pestis receptors for eight bacteriophages. Nine phages together use at least seven different Y. pestis receptors that makes some of them promising for formulation of plague therapeutic cocktails. Most phage-resistant Y. pestis mutants become attenuated and thus should not pose a serious problem for bacteriophage therapy of plague. LPS is a critical virulence factor of Y. pestis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phage Cocktails and the Future of Phage Therapy
Chan, B. K., Abedon, S. T., & Loc-Carrillo, C. (2013) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.13.47 · Cited by 914
Langdon, A., Crook, N., & Dantas, G. (2016) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0294-z · Cited by 912
Resistance Development to Bacteriophages Occurring during Bacteriophage Therapy
Oechslin, F. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v10070351 · Cited by 594
Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs?
Allen, R. C., Popat, R., Diggle, S. P., & Brown, S. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3232 · Cited by 532
High-throughput mapping of the phage resistance landscape in E. coli
Mutalik, V. K., Adler, B. A., Rishi, H. S., Piya, D., Zhong, C., Koskella, B., Kutter, E. M., Calendar, R., Novichkov, P. S., Price, M. N., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000877 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Filippov, A. A., Sergueev, K. V., He, Y., Huang, X.-Z., Gnade, B. T., Mueller, A. J., Fernandez-Prada, C. M., & Nikolich, M. P.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-09-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e25486
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166199652
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteriophage-Resistant Mutants in Yersinia pestis: Identification of Phage Receptors and Attenuation for Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0025486
- The paper
- Filippov, A. A., Sergueev, K. V., He, Y., Huang, X.-Z., Gnade, B. T., Mueller, A. J., Fernandez-Prada, C. M., & Nikolich, M. P. (2011). Bacteriophage-Resistant Mutants in Yersinia pestis: Identification of Phage Receptors and Attenuation for Mice. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.