The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metagenomic Analysis of the Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Canadian High Arctic Soils
Open accessAbstract
As human activity in the Arctic increases, so does the risk of hydrocarbon pollution events. On site bioremediation of contaminated soil is the only feasible clean up solution in these remote areas, but degradation rates vary widely between bioremediation treatments. Most previous studies have focused on the feasibility of on site clean-up and very little attention has been given to the microbial and functional communities involved and their ecology. Here, we ask the question: which microorganisms and functional genes are abundant and active during hydrocarbon degradation at cold temperature? To answer this question, we sequenced the soil metagenome of an ongoing bioremediation project in Alert, Canada through a time course. We also used reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) to quantify the expression of several hydrocarbon-degrading genes. Pseudomonas species appeared as the most abundant organisms in Alert soils right after contamination with diesel and excavation (t = 0) and one month after the start of the bioremediation treatment (t = 1m), when degradation rates were at their highest, but decreased after one year (t = 1y), when residual soil hydrocarbons were almost depleted. This trend was also reflected in hydrocarbon degrading genes, which were mainly affiliated with Gammaproteobacteria at t = 0 and t = 1m and with Alphaproteobacteria and Actinobacteria at t = 1y. RT-qPCR assays confirmed that Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus species actively expressed hydrocarbon degradation genes in Arctic biopile soils. Taken together, these results indicated that biopile treatment leads to major shifts in soil microbial communities, favoring aerobic bacteria that can degrade hydrocarbons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bala, S., Garg, D., Thirumalesh, B. V., Sharma, M., Sridhar, K., Inbaraj, B. S., & Tripathi, M. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics10080484 · Cited by 763
Impact of Long-Term Diesel Contamination on Soil Microbial Community Structure
Sutton, N. B., Maphosa, F., Morillo, J. A., Abu Al-Soud, W., Langenhoff, A. A. M., Grotenhuis, T., Rijnaarts, H. H. M., & Smidt, H. (2013) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02747-12 · Cited by 385
Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons: catabolic genes, microbial communities, and applications
Fuentes, S., Méndez, V., Aguila, P., & Seeger, M. (2014) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-014-5684-9 · Cited by 330
Microplastics in terrestrial ecosystem: Sources and migration in soil environment
Surendran, U., Jayakumar, M., Raja, P., Gopinath, G., & Chellam, P. V. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137946 · Cited by 284
Diverse alkane hydroxylase genes in microorganisms and environments
Nie, Y., Chi, C.-Q., Fang, H., Liang, J.-L., Lu, S.-L., Lai, G.-L., Tang, Y.-Q., & Wu, X.-L. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04968 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Yergeau, E., Sanschagrin, S., Beaumier, D., & Greer, C. W.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-01-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e30058
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111961874
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomic Analysis of the Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Canadian High Arctic Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0030058
- The paper
- Yergeau, E., Sanschagrin, S., Beaumier, D., & Greer, C. W. (2012). Metagenomic Analysis of the Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Canadian High Arctic Soils. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.