Cited by 220Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Dorsal Striatum and Its Limbic Connectivity Mediate Abnormal Anticipatory Reward Processing in Obesity

Open access
Nummenmaa, Lauri, Hirvonen, Jussi, Hannukainen, Jarna C., Immonen, Heidi, Lindroos, Markus M., Salminen, Paulina, Nuutila, Pirjo·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Obesity is characterized by an imbalance in the brain circuits promoting reward seeking and those governing cognitive control. Here we show that the dorsal caudate nucleus and its connections with amygdala, insula and prefrontal cortex contribute to abnormal reward processing in obesity. We measured regional brain glucose uptake in morbidly obese (n = 19) and normal weighted (n = 16) subjects with 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia and with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while anticipatory food reward was induced by repeated presentations of appetizing and bland food pictures. First, we found that glucose uptake rate in the dorsal caudate nucleus was higher in obese than in normal-weight subjects. Second, obese subjects showed increased hemodynamic responses in the caudate nucleus while viewing appetizing versus bland foods in fMRI. The caudate also showed elevated task-related functional connectivity with amygdala and insula in the obese versus normal-weight subjects. Finally, obese subjects had smaller responses to appetizing versus bland foods in the dorsolateral and orbitofrontal cortices than did normal-weight subjects, and failure to activate the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was correlated with high glucose metabolism in the dorsal caudate nucleus. These findings suggest that enhanced sensitivity to external food cues in obesity may involve abnormal stimulus-response learning and incentive motivation subserved by the dorsal caudate nucleus, which in turn may be due to abnormally high input from the amygdala and insula and dysfunctional inhibitory control by the frontal cortical regions. These functional changes in the responsiveness and interconnectivity of the reward circuit could be a critical mechanism to explain overeating in obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0031089

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent fMRI study comparing brain responses to repeated presentations of appetizing and bland food pictures in morbidly obese vs non-obese individuals found functional changes in responsiveness and interconnectivity among key regions of the reward circuit that might help explain oversensitivity to food cues in obese individuals.

    “Furthermore, a recent fMRI study that compared brain responses to repeated presentations of appetizing and bland food pictures in morbidly obese vs. non-obese individuals (146) found functional changes in the responsiveness and interconnectivity among key regions of the reward circuit that might help explain the oversensitivity to food cues in obese individuals.”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [146]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 220

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Volkow ND Wang G-J Telang F Fowler JS Thanos PK 2008 Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: Possible contributing factors. NeuroImage 42 1537 1543 18598772 PMC2659013

Authors
Nummenmaa, L., Hirvonen, J., Hannukainen, J. C., Immonen, H., Lindroos, M. M., Salminen, P., & Nuutila, P.
Affiliations
  • Turku PET Centre (FI)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Nummenmaa, Lauri
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-02-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e31089
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082395179
Cited by
220
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (251 125)
  • Aalto-Yliopisto (251125)
  • Turun Yliopisto
  • Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
obesity, reward processing, amygdala, insula, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, cognitive control, inhibitory control, food cue reactivity, overeating, euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, brain glucose metabolism, incentive motivation, stimulus-response learning
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Corpus Striatum, Glucose, Humans, Limbic System, Obesity, Reward, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review