The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High CO2 and Silicate Limitation Synergistically Increase the Toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta
Open accessAbstract
Anthropogenic CO(2) is progressively acidifying the ocean, but the responses of harmful algal bloom species that produce toxins that can bioaccumulate remain virtually unknown. The neurotoxin domoic acid is produced by the globally-distributed diatom genus Pseudo-nitzschia. This toxin is responsible for amnesic shellfish poisoning, which can result in illness or death in humans and regularly causes mass mortalities of marine mammals and birds. Domoic acid production by Pseudo-nitzschia cells is known to be regulated by nutrient availability, but potential interactions with increasing seawater CO(2) concentrations are poorly understood. Here we present experiments measuring domoic acid production by acclimatized cultures of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta that demonstrate a strong synergism between projected future CO(2) levels (765 ppm) and silicate-limited growth, which greatly increases cellular toxicity relative to growth under modern atmospheric (360 ppm) or pre-industrial (200 ppm) CO(2) conditions. Cellular Si:C ratios decrease with increasing CO(2), in a trend opposite to that seen for domoic acid production. The coastal California upwelling system where this species was isolated currently exhibits rapidly increasing levels of anthropogenic acidification, as well as widespread episodic silicate limitation of diatom growth. Our results suggest that the current ecosystem and human health impacts of toxic Pseudo-nitzschia blooms could be greatly exacerbated by future ocean acidification and 'carbon fertilization' of the coastal ocean.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ocean Acidification: The Other CO 2 Problem
Doney, S. C., Fabry, V. J., Feely, R. A., & Kleypas, J. A. (2009) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834 · Cited by 4,173
Hallegraeff, G. M. (2010) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00815.x · Cited by 1,006
Cited by
Harmful algal blooms and climate change: learning from the past and present to forecast the future
Wells, M. L., Trainer, V. L., Smayda, T. J., Karlson, B. S. O., Trick, C. G., Kudela, R. M., Ishikawa, A., Bernard, S., Wulff, A., Anderson, D. M., et al. (2015) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2015.07.009 · Cited by 828
Harmful algal blooms: A climate change co-stressor in marine and freshwater ecosystems
Griffith, A. W., & Gobler, C. J. (2020) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2019.03.008 · Cited by 598
Microorganisms and ocean global change
Hutchins, D. A., & Fu, F. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.58 · Cited by 499
Self-citationRaven, J. A., Gobler, C. J., & Hansen, P. J. (2020) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2019.03.012 · Cited by 185
Response of Photosynthesis to Ocean Acidification
University of California, I., Mackey, K., Morris, J. J., Morel, F., & Kranz, S. (2015) · Oceanography · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2015.33 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Tatters, A. O., Fu, F.-X., & Hutchins, D. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-02-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e32116
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987191606
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High CO2 and Silicate Limitation Synergistically Increase the Toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0032116
- The paper
- Tatters, A. O., Fu, F.-X., & Hutchins, D. A. (2012). High CO2 and Silicate Limitation Synergistically Increase the Toxicity of Pseudo-nitzschia fraudulenta. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.