Cited by 47Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Perineuronal Nets Play a Role in Regulating Striatal Function in the Mouse

Open access
Lee, Hyunchul, Leamey, Catherine A., Sawatari, Atomu·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The striatum is the primary input nucleus of the basal ganglia, a collection of nuclei that play important roles in motor control and associative learning. We have previously reported that perineuronal nets (PNNs), aggregations of chondroitin-sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), form in the matrix compartment of the mouse striatum during the second postnatal week. This period overlaps with important developmental changes, including the attainment of an adult-like gait. Here, we investigate the identity of the cells encapsulated by PNNs, characterize their topographical distribution and determine their function by assessing the impact of enzymatic digestion of PNNs on two striatum-dependent behaviors: ambulation and goal-directed spatial learning. We show PNNs are more numerous caudally, and that a substantial fraction (41%) of these structures surrounds parvalbumin positive (PV+) interneurons, while approximately 51% of PV+ cells are ensheathed by PNNs. The colocalization of these structures is greatest in dorsal, lateral and caudal regions of the striatum. Bilateral digestion of striatal PNNs led to an increase in both the width and variability of hind limb gait. Intriguingly, this also resulted in an improvement in the acquisition rate of the Morris water maze. Together, these data show that PNNs are associated with specific elements of striatal circuits and play a key role in regulating the function of this important structure in the mouse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0032747

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bilateral digestion of striatal PNNs improves acquisition rate in Morris water maze.

    “this also resulted in an improvement in the acquisition rate of the Morris water maze”

    From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2012

  • PNNs appear linked to particular striatal circuit components and are important for controlling striatal activity.

    “These findings suggest that PNNs are associated with specific elements of striatal circuits and play a key role in regulating the function of this important structure (Lee et al., 2012)”

    From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2012

  • Bilateral digestion of striatal PNNs increases width and variability of hind limb gait.

    “bilateral digestion of striatal PNNs was reported to increase both the width and variability of hind limb gait”

    From Perineuronal nets and schizophrenia: The importance of neuronal coatings (2014) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 47

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Gerfen CR Wilson CJ 1996 The basal ganglia. Integrated Systems of the CNS, Part III Amsterdam Elsevier Science 371 468

Authors
Lee, H., Leamey, C. A., & Sawatari, A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Sawatari, Atomu
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-03-12
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e32747
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069762407
Cited by
47
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
perineuronal nets, striatum, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, parvalbumin interneurons, basal ganglia, gait, spatial learning, Morris water maze, enzymatic digestion, postnatal development, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Basal Ganglia, Extracellular Matrix, Immunohistochemistry, Interneurons, Locomotion, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuronal Plasticity, Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans, Space Perception, Maze Learning, Lectins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review