The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Future Clinical Changes of MCI Patients Using Longitudinal and Multimodal Biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
Accurate prediction of clinical changes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, including both qualitative change (i.e., conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD)) and quantitative change (i.e., cognitive scores) at future time points, is important for early diagnosis of AD and for monitoring the disease progression. In this paper, we propose to predict future clinical changes of MCI patients by using both baseline and longitudinal multimodality data. To do this, we first develop a longitudinal feature selection method to jointly select brain regions across multiple time points for each modality. Specifically, for each time point, we train a sparse linear regression model by using the imaging data and the corresponding clinical scores, with an extra 'group regularization' to group the weights corresponding to the same brain region across multiple time points together and to allow for selection of brain regions based on the strength of multiple time points jointly. Then, to further reflect the longitudinal changes on the selected brain regions, we extract a set of longitudinal features from the original baseline and longitudinal data. Finally, we combine all features on the selected brain regions, from different modalities, for prediction by using our previously proposed multi-kernel SVM. We validate our method on 88 ADNI MCI subjects, with both MRI and FDG-PET data and the corresponding clinical scores (i.e., MMSE and ADAS-Cog) at 5 different time points. We first predict the clinical scores (MMSE and ADAS-Cog) at 24-month by using the multimodality data at previous time points, and then predict the conversion of MCI to AD by using the multimodality data at time points which are at least 6-month ahead of the conversion. The results on both sets of experiments show that our proposed method can achieve better performance in predicting future clinical changes of MCI patients than the conventional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects
Shaw, L. M., Vanderstichele, H., Knapik‐Czajka, M., Clark, C. M., Aisen, P. S., Petersen, R. C., Blennow, K., Soares, H., Simon, A., Lewczuk, P., et al. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21610 · Cited by 2,065
Self-citationPrediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment
Jack, C. R., Petersen, R. C., Xu, Y. C., O’Brien, P. C., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Boeve, B. F., Waring, S. C., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.52.7.1397 · Cited by 1,404
CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mattsson, N. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1064 · Cited by 1,176
Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD
De Santi, S., de Leon, M. J., Rusinek, H., Convit, A., Tarshish, C. Y., Roche, A., Tsui, W. H., Kandil, E., Boppana, M., Daisley, K., et al. (2001) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00230-5 · Cited by 548
Cited by
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968
“ROI-based approach considers the structurally or functionally predefined brain regions and extracts representative features from each region (Cuingnet et al., 2011; Davatzikos et al., 2011; Kohannim et al., 2010; Nordberg et al., 2010; Suk and Shen, 2013; Walhovd et al., 2010; Zhang and Shen, 2012).”
Self-citationSingle subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls
Arbabshirani, M. R., Plis, S., Sui, J., & Calhoun, V. D. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079 · Cited by 912
Creavin, S. T., Wisniewski, S., Noel-Storr, A. H., Trevelyan, C. M., Hampton, T., Rayment, D., Thom, V. M., Nash, K. J. E., Elhamoui, H., Milligan, R., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011145.pub2 · Cited by 820
Islam, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-018-0080-3 · Cited by 478
Predicting alzheimer’s disease progression using multi-modal deep learning approach
Lee, G., Nho, K., Kang, B., Sohn, K.-A., Kim, D., Initiative, F. A. D. N., Weiner, M. W., Aisen, P., Petersen, R., Jack, C. R., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37769-z · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, D., Shen, D., & Initiative, A. D. N.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-03-22
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e33182
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992054897
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Future Clinical Changes of MCI Patients Using Longitudinal and Multimodal Biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0033182
- The paper
- Zhang, D., Shen, D., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2012). Predicting Future Clinical Changes of MCI Patients Using Longitudinal and Multimodal Biomarkers. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.