The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Executive Functions Predict the Success of Top-Soccer Players
Open accessAbstract
While the importance of physical abilities and motor coordination is non-contested in sport, more focus has recently been turned toward cognitive processes important for different sports. However, this line of studies has often investigated sport-specific cognitive traits, while few studies have focused on general cognitive traits. We explored if measures of general executive functions can predict the success of a soccer player. The present study used standardized neuropsychological assessment tools assessing players' general executive functions including on-line multi-processing such as creativity, response inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. In a first cross-sectional part of the study we compared the results between High Division players (HD), Lower Division players (LD) and a standardized norm group. The result shows that both HD and LD players had significantly better measures of executive functions in comparison to the norm group for both men and women. Moreover, the HD players outperformed the LD players in these tests. In the second prospective part of the study, a partial correlation test showed a significant correlation between the result from the executive test and the numbers of goals and assists the players had scored two seasons later. The results from this study strongly suggest that results in cognitive function tests predict the success of ball sport players.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues.
CHAN, R., SHUM, D., TOULOPOULOU, T., & CHEN, E. (2008) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010 · Cited by 1,401
Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x · Cited by 1,293
Cited by
Bagetta (2016) · doi:10.1111/mbe.12100 · Cited by 433
Talent identification in sport: a systematic review
Johnston, K., Wattie, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0803-2 · Cited by 419
Pesce, C. (2012) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.34.6.766 · Cited by 383
The factor structure of executive function in childhood and adolescence.
Laureys, F., De Waelle, S., Barendse, M. T., Lenoir, M., & Deconinck, F. J. A. (2022) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101600 · Cited by 92
Contreras-Osorio, F., Campos-Jara, C., Martínez-Salazar, C., Chirosa-Ríos, L., & Martínez-García, D. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11060755 · Cited by 86
Executive Function Strengths in Athletes: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Ren, S., Shi, P., Feng, X., Zhang, K., & Wang, W. (2025) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.70212 · Cited by 49
Albertella, L., Kirkham, R., Adler, A. B., Crampton, J., Drummond, S. P. A., Fogarty, G. J., Gross, J. J., Zaichkowsky, L., Andersen, J. P., Bartone, P. T., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017675 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Vestberg, T., Gustafson, R., Maurex, L., Ingvar, M., & Petrovic, P.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-04-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e34731
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008352585
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.