The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptions and Experiences of Research Participants on Gender-Based Violence Community Based Survey: Implications for Ethical Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore how survey respondents perceived their experiences and the impact of participating in a survey, and to assess adverse consequences resulting from participation. DESIGN: Qualitative study involving purposefully selected participants who had participated in a household-based survey. METHODS: This qualitative study was nested within a survey that investigated the prevalence of gender-based violence perpetration and victimization with adult men and women in South Africa. 13 male- and 10 female-in-depth interviews were conducted with survey respondents. RESULTS: A majority of informants, without gender-differences, perceived the survey interview as a rare opportunity to share their adverse and or personal experiences in a 'safe' space. Gender-differences were noted in reporting perceptions of risks involved with survey participation. Some women remained fearful after completing the survey, that should breach of confidentiality or full survey content disclosure occur, they may be victimized by partners as a punishment for survey participation without men's approval. A number of informants generally discussed their survey participation with others. However, among women with interpersonal violence history or currently in abusive relationships, full survey content disclosure was done with fear; the partner responses were negative, and few women reported receiving threatening remarks but none reported being assaulted. In contrast no man reported adverse reaction by others. Informants with major life adversities reported that the survey had made them to relive the experiences causing them sadness and pain at the time. No informant perceived the survey as emotionally harmful or needed professional support because of survey questions. Rather the vast majority perceived benefit from survey participation. CONCLUSION: Whilst no informant felt answering the survey questions had caused them emotional or physical harm, some were distressed and anxious, albeit temporarily. Research protocols need to put in place safeguards where appropriate so that this group receives support and protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction
Kleinsasser, R. C., & Silverman, D. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329190 · Cited by 6,866
Silverman, D. (2024) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036233358 · Cited by 3,553
Fletcher, E. (2015) · International Journal of Research & Method in Education · doi:10.1080/1743727x.2015.1066173 · Cited by 1,599
Hutter, I., Hennink, M. M., & Bailey, A. J. (2020) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 902
Garcia‐Moreno, C. (2001) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 752
Researching Domestic Violence Against Women: Methodological and Ethical Considerations
Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., Peña, R., Agurto, S., & Winkvist, A. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00001.x · Cited by 619
Turner, J. R., Wit, M., Hajos, T., Wit, M., Howren, M. B., Insana, S., & Simonson, M. A. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1056 · Cited by 555
Qualitative methodology for international public health
Dahlgren, L. G., Emmelin, M., & Winkvist, A. (2007) · Cited by 507
Cited by
Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body
Sender, R., Fuchs, S., & Milo, R. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533 · Cited by 5,425
Imhann, F., Vich Vila, A., Bonder, M. J., Fu, J., Gevers, D., Visschedijk, M. C., Spekhorst, L. M., Alberts, R., Franke, L., van Dullemen, H. M., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312135 · Cited by 788
Dixon, M. L., De La Vega, A., Mills, C., Andrews-Hanna, J., Spreng, R. N., Cole, M. W., & Christoff, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1715766115 · Cited by 595
Priors in whole-genome regression: the Bayesian alphabet returns
Gianola, D. (2013) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.151753 · Cited by 457
Elhassan, Y. S., Kluckova, K., Fletcher, R. S., Schmidt, M. S., Garten, A., Doig, C. L., Cartwright, D. M., Oakey, L., Burley, C. V., Jenkinson, N., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.043 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Sikweyiya, Y., & Jewkes, R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-04-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e35495
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967448179
- Cited by
- 1,310
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 47.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions and Experiences of Research Participants on Gender-Based Violence Community Based Survey: Implications for Ethical Guidelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0035495
- The paper
- Sikweyiya, Y., & Jewkes, R. (2012). Perceptions and Experiences of Research Participants on Gender-Based Violence Community Based Survey: Implications for Ethical Guidelines. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.