The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mouse Estrous Cycle Identification Tool and Images
Open accessAbstract
The efficiency of producing timed pregnant or pseudopregnant mice can be increased by identifying those in proestrus or estrus. Visual observation of the vagina is the quickest method, requires no special equipment, and is best used when only proestrus or estrus stages need to be identified. Strain to strain differences, especially in coat color can make it difficult to determine the stage of the estrous cycle accurately by visual observation. Presented here are a series of images of the vaginal opening at each stage of the estrous cycle for 3 mouse strains of different coat colors: black (C57BL/6J), agouti (CByB6F1/J) and albino (BALB/cByJ). When all 4 stages (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus) need to be identified, vaginal cytology is regarded as the most accurate method. An identification tool is presented to aid the user in determining the stage of estrous when using vaginal cytology. These images and descriptions are an excellent resource for learning how to determine the stage of the estrous cycle by visual observation or vaginal cytology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herranz, D., Ambesi-Impiombato, A., Palomero, T., Schnell, S. A., Belver, L., Wendorff, A. A., Xu, L., Castillo-Martin, M., Llobet-Navás, D., Cordon-Cardo, C., et al. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3665 · Cited by 405
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Current Understanding and Burning Questions
Willems, H. M. E., Ahmed, S. S., Liu, J., Xu, Z., & Peters, B. M. (2020) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof6010027 · Cited by 357
A distributed network for social cognition enriched for oxytocin receptors
Mitre, M., Marlin, B. J., Schiavo, J. K., Morina, E., Norden, S. E., Hackett, T. A., Aoki, C. J., Chao, M. V., & Froemke, R. C. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2409-15.2016 · Cited by 305
Gaignard, P., Savouroux, S., Liere, P., Pianos, A., Thérond, P., Schumacher, M., Slama, A., & Guennoun, R. (2015) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2014-1913 · Cited by 150
Melin, V. E., Melin, T. E., Dessify, B. J., Nguyen, C. T., Shea, C. S., & Hrubec, T. C. (2016) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.10.006 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Byers, S. L., Wiles, M. V., Dunn, S. L., & Taft, R. A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-04-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e35538
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096790979
- Cited by
- 1,210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mouse Estrous Cycle Identification Tool and Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0035538
- The paper
- Byers, S. L., Wiles, M. V., Dunn, S. L., & Taft, R. A. (2012). Mouse Estrous Cycle Identification Tool and Images. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
